X-Cube Fracton Model on Generic Lattices: Phases and Geometric Order
Kevin Slagle, Yong Baek Kim
TL;DR
This work shows that fracton order, exemplified by the X-Cube model, is inherently sensitive to lattice geometry. By introducing intersecting-surfaces (i-surfaces) lattices, the authors generalize the X-Cube model to arbitrary 3D geometries and demonstrate that mobility, braiding, and ground-state degeneracy depend on curvature and i-surface topology. They reveal geometry-driven phase structure, proposing a coarse phase equivalence based on generalized local unitaries combined with quasi-isometries, effectively redefining fracton phases as geometric orders. The results imply a rich landscape of fracton phases across diverse lattices and hint at deeper connections to geometric group theory and gravity-like behavior in gapped fracton systems.
Abstract
Fracton order is a new kind of quantum order characterized by topological excitations that exhibit remarkable mobility restrictions and a robust ground state degeneracy (GSD) which can increase exponentially with system size. In this paper, we present a generic lattice construction (in three dimensions) for a generalized X-cube model of fracton order, where the mobility restrictions of the subdimensional particles inherit the geometry of the lattice. This helps explain a previous result that lattice curvature can produce a robust GSD, even on a manifold with trivial topology. We provide explicit examples to show that the (zero temperature) phase of matter is sensitive to the lattice geometry. In one example, the lattice geometry confines the dimension-1 particles to small loops, which allows the fractons to be fully mobile charges, and the resulting phase is equivalent to (3+1)-dimensional toric code. However, the phase is sensitive to more than just lattice curvature; different lattices without curvature (e.g. cubic or stacked kagome lattices) also result in different phases of matter, which are separated by phase transitions. Unintuitively however, according to a previous definition of phase [Chen, Gu, Wen 2010], even just a rotated or rescaled cubic lattice results in different phases of matter, which motivates us to propose a new and coarser definition of phase for gapped ground states and fracton order. The new equivalence relation between ground states is given by the composition of a local unitary transformation and a quasi-isometry (which can rotate and rescale the lattice); equivalently, ground states are in the same phase if they can be adiabatically connected by varying both the Hamiltonian and the positions of the degrees of freedom (via a quasi-isometry). In light of the importance of geometry, we further propose that fracton orders should be regarded as a geometric order.
