Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Differential equations for loop integrals in Baikov representation

Jorrit Bosma, Kasper J. Larsen, Yang Zhang

TL;DR

The paper proves that differential equations for multi-loop Feynman integrals can be derived in Baikov representation without relying on dimension-shift identities, by establishing a fundamental ideal membership for the Baikov polynomial F. It further shows that, for a large class of two- and three-loop diagrams, an enhanced ideal membership allows avoiding squared propagators in intermediate IBP steps, and that the resulting systems can be transformed into canonical ε-forms. Through explicit examples of planar and non-planar massless double-box topologies, the authors demonstrate the method’s practicality and provide constructive procedures for the necessary cofactors and basis changes. They also identify a counterexample where the enhanced membership fails, indicating that classification of diagrams where the property holds remains an open problem. Overall, the approach offers a computationally favorable route to differential equations for loop integrals with reduced reliance on dimension shifts and squared propagators, potentially easing high-precision NNLO calculations.

Abstract

We present a proof that differential equations for Feynman loop integrals can always be derived in Baikov representation without involving dimension-shift identities. We moreover show that in a large class of two- and three-loop diagrams it is possible to avoid squared propagators in the intermediate steps of setting up the differential equations.

Differential equations for loop integrals in Baikov representation

TL;DR

The paper proves that differential equations for multi-loop Feynman integrals can be derived in Baikov representation without relying on dimension-shift identities, by establishing a fundamental ideal membership for the Baikov polynomial F. It further shows that, for a large class of two- and three-loop diagrams, an enhanced ideal membership allows avoiding squared propagators in intermediate IBP steps, and that the resulting systems can be transformed into canonical ε-forms. Through explicit examples of planar and non-planar massless double-box topologies, the authors demonstrate the method’s practicality and provide constructive procedures for the necessary cofactors and basis changes. They also identify a counterexample where the enhanced membership fails, indicating that classification of diagrams where the property holds remains an open problem. Overall, the approach offers a computationally favorable route to differential equations for loop integrals with reduced reliance on dimension shifts and squared propagators, potentially easing high-precision NNLO calculations.

Abstract

We present a proof that differential equations for Feynman loop integrals can always be derived in Baikov representation without involving dimension-shift identities. We moreover show that in a large class of two- and three-loop diagrams it is possible to avoid squared propagators in the intermediate steps of setting up the differential equations.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 12 sections, 1 theorem, 68 equations, 4 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Taking the Baikov polynomial in eq. (eq:definition_of_Baikov_polynomial) to depend on the Baikov variables in eq. (eq:definition_of_z) and the $\lambda_{ij}$ in eq. (eq:definition_of_lambda) and letting $\chi$ denote any of the $\lambda_{ij}$, there exist polynomials $(a_i, b)$ such that the followi

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: The fully massless planar double-box diagram. All external momenta are taken to be outgoing.
  • Figure 2: The fully massless non-planar double-box diagram. All external momenta are taken to be outgoing.
  • Figure 3: A selection of diagrams for which the enhanced ideal membership in eq. (\ref{['eq:Baikov_poly_ideal_membership_2']}) has been verified. The bold lines represent massive momenta and propagators.
  • Figure 4: Non-planar double-box diagram. The bold lines represent massive momenta and propagators. For this diagram, the enhanced ideal membership eq. (\ref{['eq:Baikov_poly_ideal_membership_2']}) does not hold.

Theorems & Definitions (2)

  • Theorem 1
  • proof