Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the equation $N_{p_1}(E)\cdot N_{p_2}(E)\cdots N_{p_k}(E)=n$

Kirti Joshi

TL;DR

This work investigates the distribution of the number of points $N_p(E)$ on elliptic curves modulo primes of good reduction, introducing $G_k(E,n)$ to count $k$-tuples of primes with a fixed product $N_p(E)$. Under GRH for non-CM curves (unconditionally for CM), it proves that $G_k(E,n)$ is unbounded for all $k\ge3$, and conjectures the same for $k=1,2$—the existence of arbitrarily long elliptic progressions of primes with equal $N_p(E)$. The approach blends division-field density, high-moment estimates via a fourth-moment calculation, and sieve techniques to transfer Erdős-type combinatorics to the elliptic-curve setting, with CM vs non-CM distinctions influencing the analytic tools used. The paper further extends the framework to the classical Erdős problem $(p_1-1)\cdots(p_k-1)=n$, providing analogous unboundedness results and stronger lower bounds for $k=2$ and $k\ge3$, and presents extensive numerical data illustrating elliptic progressions, highlighting notably richer phenomena in CM cases.

Abstract

For a given elliptic curve $E/\mathbb{Q}$, let $N_p(E)$ be the number of points on $E$ modulo $p$ for a prime of good reduction for $E$. Given integer $n$, let $G_k(E,n)$ be the number of $k$-tuples of $p_1<p_2<\ldots <p_k$ primes of good reduction for $E$, for which the equation in the title holds, then on assuming the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis for elliptic curves without CM (and unconditionally if the curves have complex multiplication), I show that $\varlimsup_{n\to\infty} G_k(E,n)=\infty$ for any integer $k\geq 3$. I conjecture that this result also holds for $k=1,2$ i.e. this conjecture says that there are arbitrarily long ``elliptic progressions of primes'' i.e. sequences of primes $p_1<p_2<\cdots <p_m$ of arbitrary lengths $m$ such that $N_{p_1}(E)=N_{p_2}(E)=\cdots =N_{p_m}(E)$.

On the equation $N_{p_1}(E)\cdot N_{p_2}(E)\cdots N_{p_k}(E)=n$

TL;DR

This work investigates the distribution of the number of points on elliptic curves modulo primes of good reduction, introducing to count -tuples of primes with a fixed product . Under GRH for non-CM curves (unconditionally for CM), it proves that is unbounded for all , and conjectures the same for —the existence of arbitrarily long elliptic progressions of primes with equal . The approach blends division-field density, high-moment estimates via a fourth-moment calculation, and sieve techniques to transfer Erdős-type combinatorics to the elliptic-curve setting, with CM vs non-CM distinctions influencing the analytic tools used. The paper further extends the framework to the classical Erdős problem , providing analogous unboundedness results and stronger lower bounds for and , and presents extensive numerical data illustrating elliptic progressions, highlighting notably richer phenomena in CM cases.

Abstract

For a given elliptic curve , let be the number of points on modulo for a prime of good reduction for . Given integer , let be the number of -tuples of primes of good reduction for , for which the equation in the title holds, then on assuming the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis for elliptic curves without CM (and unconditionally if the curves have complex multiplication), I show that for any integer . I conjecture that this result also holds for i.e. this conjecture says that there are arbitrarily long ``elliptic progressions of primes'' i.e. sequences of primes of arbitrary lengths such that .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 15 theorems, 144 equations, 7 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1.7

Let $E/{\mathbb Q}$ be an elliptic curve. If $E$ does not have complex multiplication, then assume that GRH (def:grh) holds for $E$. Then for any integer $k\geq 3$ More precisely, for every integer $k\geq 3$ and for all sufficiently large $x$, there exist integers $n\leq x$ with and $\delta=\delta(k)= \log(2)k(1-2\varepsilon)-2>0$.

Theorems & Definitions (46)

  • Theorem 1.7
  • Definition 2.7
  • Theorem 2.13
  • Proposition 2.14
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.32
  • proof
  • Remark 2.54
  • Lemma 3.1
  • proof
  • ...and 36 more