From Bosonic Topological Transition to Symmetric Fermion Mass Generation
Yi-Zhuang You, Yin-Chen He, Ashvin Vishwanath, Cenke Xu
TL;DR
This work presents an alternative, field-theoretic description of the bosonic topological transition (BTT) and connects it to the symmetric mass generation (SMG) transition within a unified parton framework. The BTT is captured by a compact $N_f=4$ QED with emergent $O(4)$ symmetry, while SMG is described by an $SU(2)$ QCD–Higgs theory with four fermionic flavors; the two are bridged on a bilayer honeycomb lattice, and their compatibility is reinforced by a mass-muning argument that merges the two theories into a single low-energy $N_f=4$ QED. The results illuminate how deconfined quantum criticality and symmetry-protected topological transitions can be related via parton fractionalization and gauge dynamics, offering a non-Landau route to gap formation without symmetry breaking. The findings also suggest intermediate phases and monopole physics consistent with lattice symmetries, emphasizing the role of emergent gauge structures in 2+1D quantum criticality.
Abstract
The bosonic topological transition (BTT) is a quantum critical point between the bosonic symmetry protected topological phase and the trivial phase. In this work, we derive a description of this transition in terms of compact quantum electrodynamics (QED) with four fermion flavors ($N_f=4$). This allows us to describe the transition in a lattice model with the maximal microscopic symmetry: an internal SO(4) symmetry. Within a systematic renormalization group analysis, we identify the critical point with the desired O(4) emergent symmetry and all expected deformations. By lowering the microscopic symmetry we recover the previous $N_f=2$ non-compact QED description of the BTT. Finally, by merging two BTTs we recover a previously discussed theory of symmetric mass generation, as an SU(2) quantum chromodynamics-Higgs theory with $N_f=4$ flavors of SU(2) fundamental fermions and one SU(2) fundamental Higgs boson. This provides a consistency check on both theories.
