Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On Strict Higher C*-categories

Paolo Bertozzini, Roberto Conti, Wicharn Lewkeeratiyutkul, Noppakhun Suthichitranont

TL;DR

The paper develops a framework for strict involutive higher categories with a relaxed non-commutative exchange to avoid Eckmann–Hilton collapse, enabling non-trivial higher C*-categorical structures. It introduces strict globular $n$-categories, non-commutative exchange, and strict higher involutions, and extends these to higher algebroids and Fell bundles, culminating in hyper-C*-algebras and hypermatrices as concrete examples. The work provides a pathway toward higher functional analysis, higher Gel′fand–Naĭmark theory, and potential applications to non-commutative geometry and relational quantum theory, with detailed constructions of higher C*-categories of Longo–Roberts type and their convolution/bimodule realizations. It also outlines substantial future directions, including spectral reconstructions of non-commutative spaces, higher Morita theory, and quantum-relational formulations, enriching the mathematical apparatus for non-commutative topology and quantum field theory.

Abstract

We provide definitions for strict involutive higher categories (a vertical categorification of dagger categories), strict higher C*-categories and higher Fell bundles (over arbitrary involutive higher topological categories). We put forward a proposal for a relaxed form of the exchange property for higher (C*)-categories that avoids the Eckmann-Hilton collapse and hence allows the construction of explicit non-trivial "non-commutative" examples arising from the study of hypermatrices and hyper-C*-algebras, here defined. Alternatives to the usual globular and cubical settings for strict higher categories are also explored. Applications of these non-commutative higher C*-categories are envisaged in the study of morphisms in non-commutative geometry and in the algebraic formulation of relational quantum theory.

On Strict Higher C*-categories

TL;DR

The paper develops a framework for strict involutive higher categories with a relaxed non-commutative exchange to avoid Eckmann–Hilton collapse, enabling non-trivial higher C*-categorical structures. It introduces strict globular -categories, non-commutative exchange, and strict higher involutions, and extends these to higher algebroids and Fell bundles, culminating in hyper-C*-algebras and hypermatrices as concrete examples. The work provides a pathway toward higher functional analysis, higher Gel′fand–Naĭmark theory, and potential applications to non-commutative geometry and relational quantum theory, with detailed constructions of higher C*-categories of Longo–Roberts type and their convolution/bimodule realizations. It also outlines substantial future directions, including spectral reconstructions of non-commutative spaces, higher Morita theory, and quantum-relational formulations, enriching the mathematical apparatus for non-commutative topology and quantum field theory.

Abstract

We provide definitions for strict involutive higher categories (a vertical categorification of dagger categories), strict higher C*-categories and higher Fell bundles (over arbitrary involutive higher topological categories). We put forward a proposal for a relaxed form of the exchange property for higher (C*)-categories that avoids the Eckmann-Hilton collapse and hence allows the construction of explicit non-trivial "non-commutative" examples arising from the study of hypermatrices and hyper-C*-algebras, here defined. Alternatives to the usual globular and cubical settings for strict higher categories are also explored. Applications of these non-commutative higher C*-categories are envisaged in the study of morphisms in non-commutative geometry and in the algebraic formulation of relational quantum theory.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 20 sections, 17 theorems, 58 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.6

There is a duality between the bicategories:With operations given by composition and tensor product.

Theorems & Definitions (79)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Definition 2.2
  • Remark 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Remark 2.5
  • Theorem 2.6: Takahashi T2
  • Theorem 2.7: Bertozzini, Conti, Lewkeeratiyutkul BCL2
  • Definition 2.8
  • Remark 2.9
  • Definition 2.10
  • ...and 69 more