Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Back to baxterisation

N. Crampe, E. Ragoucy, M. Vanicat

TL;DR

This work extends baxterisation techniques to three new algebras, $\mathcal{A}_{\mathfrak n}(a,b,c)$, $\mathcal{B}_{\mathfrak n}$, and $\mathcal{C}_{\mathfrak n}$, which sit close to the braid algebra and yield $R$-matrices with spectral parameters for the braided Yang–Baxter equation. It establishes how these algebras relate to known cosets, derives scalar and some two-dimensional representations, and presents a main theorem providing explicit forms of the baxterisation function $f(x,y)$ for three cases, enabling braided YBE solutions via $\check R_i(x,y)=(1-f(x,y)\sigma_i)(1-f(y,x)\sigma_i)^{-1}$. The key contributions are the algebra definitions, the scalar and low-dimensional representations, and the explicit baxterisation results for the $\mathcal{A}_3(a,b,c)$, $\mathcal{B}_3$, and $\mathcal{C}_3$ cases, along with a discussion of how these algebras connect to Hecke, BMW, and braid-coset structures. This work expands the toolkit for constructing integrable models by providing new seeds for $R$-matrices and highlights the potential for a broader classification of baxterisable cosets of the braid algebra.

Abstract

In the continuity of our previous paper arXiv:1509.05516, we define three new algebras, $A_{n}(a,b,c)$, $B_{n}$ and $C_{n}$, that are close to the braid algebra. They allow to build solutions to the braided Yang-Baxter equation with spectral parameters. The construction is based on a baxterisation procedure, similar to the one used in the context of Hecke or BMW algebras. The $A_{n}(a,b,c)$ algebra depends on three arbitrary parameters, and when the parameter $a$ is set to zero, we recover the algebra $M_{n}(b,c)$ already introduced elsewhere for purpose of baxterisation. The Hecke algebra (and its baxterisation) can be recovered from a coset of the $A_{n}(0,0,c)$ algebra. The algebra $A_{n}(0,b,-b^2)$ is a coset of the braid algebra. The two other algebras $B_{n}$ and $C_{n}$ do not possess any parameter, and can be also viewed as a coset of the braid algebra.

Back to baxterisation

TL;DR

This work extends baxterisation techniques to three new algebras, , , and , which sit close to the braid algebra and yield -matrices with spectral parameters for the braided Yang–Baxter equation. It establishes how these algebras relate to known cosets, derives scalar and some two-dimensional representations, and presents a main theorem providing explicit forms of the baxterisation function for three cases, enabling braided YBE solutions via . The key contributions are the algebra definitions, the scalar and low-dimensional representations, and the explicit baxterisation results for the , , and cases, along with a discussion of how these algebras connect to Hecke, BMW, and braid-coset structures. This work expands the toolkit for constructing integrable models by providing new seeds for -matrices and highlights the potential for a broader classification of baxterisable cosets of the braid algebra.

Abstract

In the continuity of our previous paper arXiv:1509.05516, we define three new algebras, , and , that are close to the braid algebra. They allow to build solutions to the braided Yang-Baxter equation with spectral parameters. The construction is based on a baxterisation procedure, similar to the one used in the context of Hecke or BMW algebras. The algebra depends on three arbitrary parameters, and when the parameter is set to zero, we recover the algebra already introduced elsewhere for purpose of baxterisation. The Hecke algebra (and its baxterisation) can be recovered from a coset of the algebra. The algebra is a coset of the braid algebra. The two other algebras and do not possess any parameter, and can be also viewed as a coset of the braid algebra.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 8 theorems, 25 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.4

If $a\neq 2$, relation eq:aa5 is implied by relations eq:aa1, eq:aa2 and eq:aa3.

Theorems & Definitions (15)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Definition 1.3
  • Proposition 1.4
  • Proposition 1.5
  • Proposition 1.6
  • Definition 1.7
  • Remark 1.1
  • Remark 1.2
  • Definition 1.8
  • ...and 5 more