Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Moonshine Anomaly

Theo Johnson-Freyd

TL;DR

This work determines the Moonshine anomaly $\\omega^{\\nat}$ for the Monster group acting on its moonshine module $V^{\\natural}$ by combining orbifold/anomaly theory for holomorphic CFTs with a finite-group form of T-duality. The main result shows $\\omega^{\\nat}$ has exact order $24$ and is not realized as a Chern class or a fractional Pontryagin class, with a prime-by-prime analysis supported by T-duality between Monster centralizers and Leech lattice CFT centralizers. The proof strategically uses a Leech-lattice-based CFT, LHS spectral sequences, and McKay-type subgroup analyses to bound the 2- and 3-parts and to rule out Chern-class realization, while Remarkably connecting deep moonshine data to a higher-categorical TFT framework. The findings illuminate how anomalies in holomorphic CFTs encode moonshine phenomena, and suggest (via conjectures discussed) that the third cohomology $\\mathrm{H}^3(\\mathds{M}, \mathrm{U}(1))$ may be isomorphic to $\\mathbb{Z}_{24}$, reinforcing the unity between algebraic, geometric, and topological perspectives in moonshine. The approach provides a robust method to compute finite-group anomalies in holomorphic theories and links orbifold theory to the Leech lattice CFT through finite-group T-duality.

Abstract

The anomaly for the Monster group $\mathbb{M}$ acting on its natural (aka moonshine) representation $V^\natural$ is a particular cohomology class $ω^\natural \in \mathrm{H}^3(\mathbb{M},\mathrm{U}(1))$ that arises as a conformal field theoretic generalization of the second Chern class of a representation. This paper shows that $ω^\natural$ has order exactly $24$ and is not a Chern class. In order to perform this computation, this paper introduces a finite-group version of T-duality, which is used to relate $ω^\natural$ to the anomaly for the Leech lattice CFT.

The Moonshine Anomaly

TL;DR

This work determines the Moonshine anomaly for the Monster group acting on its moonshine module by combining orbifold/anomaly theory for holomorphic CFTs with a finite-group form of T-duality. The main result shows has exact order and is not realized as a Chern class or a fractional Pontryagin class, with a prime-by-prime analysis supported by T-duality between Monster centralizers and Leech lattice CFT centralizers. The proof strategically uses a Leech-lattice-based CFT, LHS spectral sequences, and McKay-type subgroup analyses to bound the 2- and 3-parts and to rule out Chern-class realization, while Remarkably connecting deep moonshine data to a higher-categorical TFT framework. The findings illuminate how anomalies in holomorphic CFTs encode moonshine phenomena, and suggest (via conjectures discussed) that the third cohomology may be isomorphic to , reinforcing the unity between algebraic, geometric, and topological perspectives in moonshine. The approach provides a robust method to compute finite-group anomalies in holomorphic theories and links orbifold theory to the Leech lattice CFT through finite-group T-duality.

Abstract

The anomaly for the Monster group acting on its natural (aka moonshine) representation is a particular cohomology class that arises as a conformal field theoretic generalization of the second Chern class of a representation. This paper shows that has order exactly and is not a Chern class. In order to perform this computation, this paper introduces a finite-group version of T-duality, which is used to relate to the anomaly for the Leech lattice CFT.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 15 sections, 18 theorems, 25 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

The order of $\omega^\natural \in \mathop{\mathrm{H}}\nolimits^3(\mathds M,\mathrm U(1))$ is exactly $24$. Although Chern and fractional Pontryagin classes can arise as anomalies, $\omega^\natural$ is neither a Chern nor a fractional Pontryagin class of any representation of $\mathds M$.

Theorems & Definitions (37)

  • Theorem 1
  • Theorem 2: JFT
  • Conjecture 1
  • Conjecture 2
  • Conjecture 3
  • Example 2.1.1
  • Example 2.1.2
  • Proposition 2.2.1: MR2730815
  • proof
  • Proposition 2.3.1
  • ...and 27 more