A characterization of testable hypergraph properties
Felix Joos, Jaehoon Kim, Daniela Kühn, Deryk Osthus
TL;DR
The paper characterizes testable properties of dense $k$-uniform hypergraphs by proving that a $k$-graph property is testable if and only if it is regular reducible, extending the graph-case result of AFNS09 to hypergraphs. The approach combines strong hypergraph regularity with a regular-approximation framework and a random subhypergraph sampling tool from a companion paper to reduce testing to a bounded collection of regularity instances $R=(\varepsilon,\mathbf{a},d_{\mathbf{a},k})$, and to relate sample-based evidence to global structure via induced counting lemmas. A key outcome is the equivalence between testability and estimability for hypergraph properties, enabling explicit estimators built from a finite set of regularity instances. The framework yields concrete applications, including testing the injective homomorphism density and the maximum $\,\ell$-way cut, demonstrating the practical reach of the characterization despite the typically tower-type quantitative bounds. Overall, the results unify property testing, hypergraph regularity, and graph limits into a cohesive theory for higher-order combinatorial structures with broad implications for combinatorics and theoretical computer science.
Abstract
We provide a combinatorial characterization of all testable properties of $k$-uniform hypergraphs ($k$-graphs for short). Here, a $k$-graph property $P$ is testable if there is a randomized algorithm which makes a bounded number of edge queries and distinguishes with probability $2/3$ between $k$-graphs that satisfy $P$ and those that are far from satisfying $P$. For the $2$-graph case, such a combinatorial characterization was obtained by Alon, Fischer, Newman and Shapira. Our results for the $k$-graph setting are in contrast to those of Austin and Tao, who showed that for the somewhat stronger concept of local repairability, the testability results for graphs do not extend to the $3$-graph setting. Our proof relies on a random subhypergraph sampling result proved in a companion paper.
