Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Walls, Anomalies, and (De)Confinement in Quantum Anti-Ferromagnets

Zohar Komargodski, Tin Sulejmanpasic, Mithat Ünsal

TL;DR

The paper studies domain walls in the 2+1D Abelian-Higgs model with even monopoles, showing that a mixed 't Hooft anomaly between charge-conjugation and spin-rotation symmetries is saturated on the wall. This forces deconfinement of bulk-confined spinons on the wall, realized either by spontaneous C-symmetry breaking or by a gapless wall theory such as the $SU(2)_1$ WZW model, with concrete lattice and semiclassical pictures supporting the scenario. The analysis extends to easy-plane/axis deformations and to 3+1D Abelian-Higgs theories with ANO vortices, where the wall can undergo BKT-like transitions consistent with anomalies. The results connect condensed-matter realizations of VBS physics to anomaly inflow and to broader Yang–Mills analogies, offering predictions testable in lattice simulations and guiding the interpretation of domain-wall excitations.

Abstract

We consider the Abelian-Higgs model in 2+1 dimensions with instanton-monopole defects. This model is closely related to the phases of quantum anti-ferromagnets. In the presence of $\mathbb{Z}_2$ preserving monopole operators, there are two confining ground states in the monopole phase, corresponding to the Valence Bond Solid (VBS) phase of quantum magnets. We show that the domain-wall carries a 't Hooft anomaly in this case. The anomaly can be saturated by, e.g., charge-conjugation breaking on the wall or by the domain wall theory becoming gapless (a gapless model that saturates the anomaly is $SU(2)_1$ WZW). Either way the fundamental scalar particles (i.e. spinons) which are confined in the bulk are deconfined on the domain-wall. This $\mathbb{Z}_2$ phase can be realized either with spin-1/2 on a rectangular lattice, or spin-1 on a square lattice. In both cases the domain wall contains spin-1/2 particles (which are absent in the bulk). We discuss the possible relation to recent lattice simulations of domain walls in VBS. We further generalize the discussion to Abrikosov-Nielsen-Olsen (ANO) vortices in a dual superconductor of the Abelian-Higgs model in 3+1 dimensions, and to the easy-plane limit of anti-ferromagnets. In the latter case the wall can undergo a variant of the BKT transition (consistent with the anomalies) while the bulk is still gapped. The same is true for the easy-axis limit of anti-ferromagnets. We also touch upon some analogies to Yang-Mills theory.

Walls, Anomalies, and (De)Confinement in Quantum Anti-Ferromagnets

TL;DR

The paper studies domain walls in the 2+1D Abelian-Higgs model with even monopoles, showing that a mixed 't Hooft anomaly between charge-conjugation and spin-rotation symmetries is saturated on the wall. This forces deconfinement of bulk-confined spinons on the wall, realized either by spontaneous C-symmetry breaking or by a gapless wall theory such as the WZW model, with concrete lattice and semiclassical pictures supporting the scenario. The analysis extends to easy-plane/axis deformations and to 3+1D Abelian-Higgs theories with ANO vortices, where the wall can undergo BKT-like transitions consistent with anomalies. The results connect condensed-matter realizations of VBS physics to anomaly inflow and to broader Yang–Mills analogies, offering predictions testable in lattice simulations and guiding the interpretation of domain-wall excitations.

Abstract

We consider the Abelian-Higgs model in 2+1 dimensions with instanton-monopole defects. This model is closely related to the phases of quantum anti-ferromagnets. In the presence of preserving monopole operators, there are two confining ground states in the monopole phase, corresponding to the Valence Bond Solid (VBS) phase of quantum magnets. We show that the domain-wall carries a 't Hooft anomaly in this case. The anomaly can be saturated by, e.g., charge-conjugation breaking on the wall or by the domain wall theory becoming gapless (a gapless model that saturates the anomaly is WZW). Either way the fundamental scalar particles (i.e. spinons) which are confined in the bulk are deconfined on the domain-wall. This phase can be realized either with spin-1/2 on a rectangular lattice, or spin-1 on a square lattice. In both cases the domain wall contains spin-1/2 particles (which are absent in the bulk). We discuss the possible relation to recent lattice simulations of domain walls in VBS. We further generalize the discussion to Abrikosov-Nielsen-Olsen (ANO) vortices in a dual superconductor of the Abelian-Higgs model in 3+1 dimensions, and to the easy-plane limit of anti-ferromagnets. In the latter case the wall can undergo a variant of the BKT transition (consistent with the anomalies) while the bulk is still gapped. The same is true for the easy-axis limit of anti-ferromagnets. We also touch upon some analogies to Yang-Mills theory.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 28 equations, 8 figures.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: The schematic depiction of domain-walls in $\mathbb{Z}_2$ broken VBS. The domain-walls restore the topological symmetry, but break charge conjugation because they carry electric flux (depicted by the arrows). The domain-walls inside the domain-walls are elementary excitations of spinons which do not exist in the bulk as they are confined. In $a)$ a single spinon on the domain-wall is depicted, as well as terms which enter \ref{['eq:meff']}. In $b)$ a pair created from the vacuum of the domain-wall is shown, changing the vacuum in between them by the charge-conjugation (i.e. changing the flux on the domain wall).
  • Figure 2: A lattice depiction of $\mathbb{Z}_2$ VBS domain walls which break the ${\cal C}$-symmetry.
  • Figure 3: A lattice depiction of spin-$1$ system. a) The product state: circles label spin-$1$ states on sites, labeled by two fundamental indices. b) The formation of the valence bond between two sites is a contraction of one of the fundamental indices on each site. c) A formation of a long valence bond with fundamental indices at the end.
  • Figure 4: a,b) Two vacua of the spin-$1$ VBS phase. c) A domain wall hosts free spin-$1/2$ particles (labeled by a blue circle), which are confined in the bulk.
  • Figure 5: A depiction of the space-time of the quantum magnet. By setting the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-topological gauge field $A$ to a constant along the $x$ direction, the VBS domain wall is induced.
  • ...and 3 more figures