Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Chaos, Complexity, and Random Matrices

Jordan Cotler, Nicholas Hunter-Jones, Junyu Liu, Beni Yoshida

TL;DR

The paper investigates chaos and scrambling through Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE) dynamics, linking out-of-time-ordered correlators (OTOCs) and spectral form factors to quantify scrambling, randomness, and complexity. It introduces k-invariance as a precise, basis-independent criterion for when dynamics are effectively described by random-matrix theory, and analyzes how GUE dynamics become approximate k-designs at intermediate times before deviating at late times. By deriving exact expressions for 2-point and 4-point spectral form factors and relating them to frame potentials, the authors quantify time scales for Haar-like behavior and complexity growth, highlighting both the successes and limitations of random matrices as models of chaotic quantum dynamics. The work emphasizes a dynamical transition from early-time chaos to late-time random-matrix universality, and proposes k-invariance as a useful tool to characterize this transition and its implications for information scrambling and holography.

Abstract

Chaos and complexity entail an entropic and computational obstruction to describing a system, and thus are intrinsically difficult to characterize. In this paper, we consider time evolution by Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE) Hamiltonians and analytically compute out-of-time-ordered correlation functions (OTOCs) and frame potentials to quantify scrambling, Haar-randomness, and circuit complexity. While our random matrix analysis gives a qualitatively correct prediction of the late-time behavior of chaotic systems, we find unphysical behavior at early times including an $\mathcal{O}(1)$ scrambling time and the apparent breakdown of spatial and temporal locality. The salient feature of GUE Hamiltonians which gives us computational traction is the Haar-invariance of the ensemble, meaning that the ensemble-averaged dynamics look the same in any basis. Motivated by this property of the GUE, we introduce $k$-invariance as a precise definition of what it means for the dynamics of a quantum system to be described by random matrix theory. We envision that the dynamical onset of approximate $k$-invariance will be a useful tool for capturing the transition from early-time chaos, as seen by OTOCs, to late-time chaos, as seen by random matrix theory.

Chaos, Complexity, and Random Matrices

TL;DR

The paper investigates chaos and scrambling through Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE) dynamics, linking out-of-time-ordered correlators (OTOCs) and spectral form factors to quantify scrambling, randomness, and complexity. It introduces k-invariance as a precise, basis-independent criterion for when dynamics are effectively described by random-matrix theory, and analyzes how GUE dynamics become approximate k-designs at intermediate times before deviating at late times. By deriving exact expressions for 2-point and 4-point spectral form factors and relating them to frame potentials, the authors quantify time scales for Haar-like behavior and complexity growth, highlighting both the successes and limitations of random matrices as models of chaotic quantum dynamics. The work emphasizes a dynamical transition from early-time chaos to late-time random-matrix universality, and proposes k-invariance as a useful tool to characterize this transition and its implications for information scrambling and holography.

Abstract

Chaos and complexity entail an entropic and computational obstruction to describing a system, and thus are intrinsically difficult to characterize. In this paper, we consider time evolution by Gaussian Unitary Ensemble (GUE) Hamiltonians and analytically compute out-of-time-ordered correlation functions (OTOCs) and frame potentials to quantify scrambling, Haar-randomness, and circuit complexity. While our random matrix analysis gives a qualitatively correct prediction of the late-time behavior of chaotic systems, we find unphysical behavior at early times including an scrambling time and the apparent breakdown of spatial and temporal locality. The salient feature of GUE Hamiltonians which gives us computational traction is the Haar-invariance of the ensemble, meaning that the ensemble-averaged dynamics look the same in any basis. Motivated by this property of the GUE, we introduce -invariance as a precise definition of what it means for the dynamics of a quantum system to be described by random matrix theory. We envision that the dynamical onset of approximate -invariance will be a useful tool for capturing the transition from early-time chaos, as seen by OTOCs, to late-time chaos, as seen by random matrix theory.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 33 sections, 199 equations, 14 figures.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: The 2-point spectral form factor for SYK with $N=26$ Majoranas at inverse temperature $\beta=5$, computed for 1000 random samples. The slope, dip, ramp, and plateau are labeled.
  • Figure 2: The $2$-point spectral form factor at infinite temperature, as given in Eq. \ref{['eq:R2func']}, plotted for various values of $L$ and normalized by the initial value $L^2$. We observe the linear ramp and scaling of the dip and plateau with $L$.
  • Figure 3: The $2$-point spectral form factor at finite temperature as per Eq. \ref{['eq:R2beta']}, on the left plotted at different values of $L$, and on the right plotted at different temperatures, normalized by the initial value. We see that the dip and plateau both scale with $\beta$ and $L$ and that lowering the temperature smooths out the oscillations in ${\cal R}_2$.
  • Figure 4: The GUE $4$-point spectral form factor at infinite temperature, plotted for different values of $L$ and normalized by their initial values. We observe the scaling of the dip and plateau, and the quadratic rise $\sim t^2$.
  • Figure 5: The 2-point form factor and the 2-point functions $\langle{A_j A_j(t)}\rangle$ of Pauli operators for $H_{\rm RNL}$ for $n=5$ sites and averaged over $500$ samples. The thick blue line is ${\cal R}_2/L^2$ and surrounding bands of lines are all 1024 Pauli 2-point functions of different weight.
  • ...and 9 more figures