Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Large-scale Stability and Astronomical Constraints for Coupled Dark-Energy Models

Weiqiang Yang, Supriya Pan, John D. Barrow

TL;DR

This study addresses large-scale perturbation instabilities in interacting dark-energy models by introducing a factor $1+w_x$ into the background energy transfer $Q$, enabling constraints across the full dark-energy equation of state space. The authors formulate a generalized IDE framework and specialize to three concrete models (IDE1–IDE3), deriving the corresponding perturbation equations and a doom-factor stability criterion. Using Planck 2015 CMB, BAO, SNIa (JLA), RSD, weak lensing, cosmic chronometers, and an $H_0$ prior, they perform MCMC analyses and find that current data mildly favor a small nonzero coupling, with $w_x$ near $-1$ and allowing phantom crossing; the standard non-interacting LCDM scenario remains allowed within 68.3% CL. The results indicate that IDEs can ease the $H_0$ tension and remain perturbatively stable, though all three models remain close to LCDM in their background evolution and produce only small deviations in observables. This work thus provides a robust, data-driven pathway to test IDE models across the full $w_x$ landscape, with implications for the nature of dark energy and its possible interaction with dark matter.

Abstract

We study large-scale inhomogeneous perturbations and instabilities of interacting dark energy (IDE) models. Past analysis of large-scale perturbative instabilities, has shown that we can only test IDE models with observational data when its parameter ranges are either $w_{x}\geq -1$ and $ξ\geq 0,$ or $w_{x}\leq -1~$ and $~ξ\leq 0$, where $w_{x}$ is the dark energy equation of state (EoS), and $ξ$ is a coupling parameter governing the strength and direction of the energy transfer. We show that by adding a factor $(1+w_{x})$ to the background energy transfer, the whole parameter space can be tested against all the data and thus, the instabilities in such interaction models can be removed. We test three classes of interaction model using the latest astronomical data from different sources. Precise constraints are found. Our analysis shows that a very small but non-zero deviation from pure $Λ$-cosmology is suggested by the observational data while the no-interaction scenario can be recovered at the 68.3% confidence-level. In particular, for three IDE models, identified as IDE 1, IDE 2, and IDE 3, the 68.3% CL constraints on the interaction coupling strengths are, $ξ= 0.0360_{-0.0360}^{+0.0091}$ (IDE 1), $ξ= 0.0433_{-0.0433}^{+0.0062}$ (IDE 2), $ξ= 0.1064_{-0.1064}^{+0.0437}$ (IDE 3). In addition, we find that the dark energy EoS tends towards the phantom region taking the 68.3% CL constraints, $w_x= -1.0230_{-0.0257}^{+0.0329}$ (IDE 1), $w_x= -1.0247_{-0.0302}^{+0.0289}$ (IDE 2), and $w_x= -1.0275_{-0.0318}^{+0.0228}$ (IDE 3). However, the possibility of $w_{x}>-1$ is also not rejected by the astronomical data used here. Moreover, we find in all IDE models that, as the value of Hubble constant decreases, the behavior of the dark energy EoS shifts from phantom to quintessence type with its EoS very close to that a simple cosmological constant at the present time.

Large-scale Stability and Astronomical Constraints for Coupled Dark-Energy Models

TL;DR

This study addresses large-scale perturbation instabilities in interacting dark-energy models by introducing a factor into the background energy transfer , enabling constraints across the full dark-energy equation of state space. The authors formulate a generalized IDE framework and specialize to three concrete models (IDE1–IDE3), deriving the corresponding perturbation equations and a doom-factor stability criterion. Using Planck 2015 CMB, BAO, SNIa (JLA), RSD, weak lensing, cosmic chronometers, and an prior, they perform MCMC analyses and find that current data mildly favor a small nonzero coupling, with near and allowing phantom crossing; the standard non-interacting LCDM scenario remains allowed within 68.3% CL. The results indicate that IDEs can ease the tension and remain perturbatively stable, though all three models remain close to LCDM in their background evolution and produce only small deviations in observables. This work thus provides a robust, data-driven pathway to test IDE models across the full landscape, with implications for the nature of dark energy and its possible interaction with dark matter.

Abstract

We study large-scale inhomogeneous perturbations and instabilities of interacting dark energy (IDE) models. Past analysis of large-scale perturbative instabilities, has shown that we can only test IDE models with observational data when its parameter ranges are either and or and , where is the dark energy equation of state (EoS), and is a coupling parameter governing the strength and direction of the energy transfer. We show that by adding a factor to the background energy transfer, the whole parameter space can be tested against all the data and thus, the instabilities in such interaction models can be removed. We test three classes of interaction model using the latest astronomical data from different sources. Precise constraints are found. Our analysis shows that a very small but non-zero deviation from pure -cosmology is suggested by the observational data while the no-interaction scenario can be recovered at the 68.3% confidence-level. In particular, for three IDE models, identified as IDE 1, IDE 2, and IDE 3, the 68.3% CL constraints on the interaction coupling strengths are, (IDE 1), (IDE 2), (IDE 3). In addition, we find that the dark energy EoS tends towards the phantom region taking the 68.3% CL constraints, (IDE 1), (IDE 2), and (IDE 3). However, the possibility of is also not rejected by the astronomical data used here. Moreover, we find in all IDE models that, as the value of Hubble constant decreases, the behavior of the dark energy EoS shifts from phantom to quintessence type with its EoS very close to that a simple cosmological constant at the present time.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 6 sections, 21 equations, 16 figures, 1 table.

Figures (16)

  • Figure 1: The figure displays the 68.3% and 95.4% confidence-region contour plots for IDE 1 using the combined analysis CMB $+$ BAO $+$ JLA $+$ RSD $+$ WL $+$ CC $+$$H_0$. Here, $\Omega_{m0}= \Omega_{c0}+ \Omega_{b0}$.
  • Figure 2: The plots show the angular CMB temperature power spectra of IDE 1 in compared to the standard $\Lambda$CDM cosmology using the combined analysis CMB $+$ BAO $+$ JLA $+$ RSD $+$ WL $+$ CC $+$$H_0$. In the left panel we show different angular CMB spectra for different values of $w_x$ including its mean value obtained from the above combined analysis while the right panel shows replica of the left panel but for different values of the coupling parameter $\xi$ including its mean value from the same combined analysis.
  • Figure 3: The figure shows the behavior of the matter power spectra of IDE 1 in compared to the $\Lambda$CDM cosmology for the combined observational analysis CMB $+$ BAO $+$ JLA $+$ RSD $+$ WL $+$ CC $+$$H_0$. In the left panel we use different values of the dark energy equation of state $w_x$, while in the right panel we vary the coupling parameter $\xi$.
  • Figure 4: MCMC samples in the $(w_x, \xi)$ plane coloured by the Hubble constant value $H_0$ for IDE 1 analyzed with the combined analysis CMB $+$ BAO $+$ JLA $+$ RSD $+$ WL $+$ CC $+$$H_0$.
  • Figure 5: The figure displays the 68.3% and 95.4% confidence-region contour plots for different combinations of the free parameters of IDE 2 using the combined analysis CMB $+$ BAO $+$ JLA $+$ RSD $+$ WL $+$ CC $+$$H_0$. Here, $\Omega_{m0}= \Omega_{c0}+ \Omega_{b0}$.
  • ...and 11 more figures