Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Echoes from the Abyss: The Holiday Edition!

Jahed Abedi, Hannah Dykaar, Niayesh Afshordi

Abstract

In a recent paper (arXiv:1612.00266), we reported the results of the first search for echoes from Planck-scale modifications of general relativity near black hole event horizons using the public data release by the Advanced LIGO gravitational wave observatory. While we found tentative evidence (at $\simeq 3 σ$ level) for the presence of these echoes, our statistical methodology was challenged by Ashton, et al. (arXiv:1612.05625), just in time for the holidays! In this short note, we briefly address these criticisms, arguing that they either do not affect our conclusion or change its significance by $\lesssim 0.3σ$. The real test will be whether our finding can be reproduced by independent groups using independent methodologies (and ultimately more data).

Echoes from the Abyss: The Holiday Edition!

Abstract

In a recent paper (arXiv:1612.00266), we reported the results of the first search for echoes from Planck-scale modifications of general relativity near black hole event horizons using the public data release by the Advanced LIGO gravitational wave observatory. While we found tentative evidence (at level) for the presence of these echoes, our statistical methodology was challenged by Ashton, et al. (arXiv:1612.05625), just in time for the holidays! In this short note, we briefly address these criticisms, arguing that they either do not affect our conclusion or change its significance by . The real test will be whether our finding can be reproduced by independent groups using independent methodologies (and ultimately more data).

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 equations, 2 figures.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Same as Fig. 4 in Abedi:2016hgu, but over an extended range of $x=\frac{t_{\rm echo} - t_{\rm merger}}{\Delta t_{\rm echo}}$. The SNR peaks at the predicted value of $x=1$ have 2.0$\sigma$ and 2.9$\sigma$ significance, for GW150914 and combined events respectively.
  • Figure 2: SNR$^{2}$ near the expected time of merger echoes (Eq. \ref{['t_echo_meas']}) for GW150914 in Hanford (red) and Livingston (green) detectors. Interestingly, their SNR ratio $2.74/3.37 = 0.81$ is comparable to the SNR ratio for the main event $13.3/18.6 = 0.72$. Note that, unlike Fig. (\ref{['SNR_fig']}), here we have fixed the echo parameters to their best fit values for combined detectors.