The Conformal Limit of Inflation in the Era of CMB Polarimetry
Enrico Pajer, Guilherme L. Pimentel, Jaap V. S. Van Wijck
TL;DR
This work shows that the absence of primordial tensor modes in single-field slow-roll inflation implies a new hierarchy $\varepsilon\ll\eta$, defining a conformal limit in which de Sitter isometries strongly constrain primordial fluctuations. By combining conformal symmetry with a soft-scalar consistency condition, the authors determine the full, leading-order power spectrum and bispectrum, predicting a small conformal (non-local) shape of non-Gaussianity tied to the running $\alpha_s$ via $f_{NL}^{\text{conf.}} = -\frac{25}{36}\alpha_s$. They validate these results through in-in calculations in flat/comoving gauges and a Wheeler–DeWitt wave-function approach, and discuss the necessary boundary terms and constraint-solution structure. The findings provide a scalar-sector consistency test for the simplest inflationary models that remains applicable even if tensor modes remain undetected, with potential implications for future CMB polarization and large-scale-structure observations.
Abstract
We argue that the non-detection of primordial tensor modes has taught us a great deal about the primordial universe. In single-field slow-roll inflation, the current upper bound on the tensor-to-scalar ratio, $r < 0.07$ $(95 \% ~CL)$, implies that the Hubble slow-roll parameters obey $\varepsilon \ll η$, and therefore establishes the existence of a new hierarchy. We dub this regime the conformal limit of (slow-roll) inflation, and show that it includes Starobinsky-like inflation as well as all viable single-field models with a sub-Planckian field excursion. In this limit, all primordial correlators are constrained by the full conformal group to leading non-trivial order in slow-roll. This fixes the power spectrum and the full bispectrum, and leads to the "conformal" shape of non-Gaussianity. The size of non-Gaussianity is related to the running of the spectral index by a consistency condition, and therefore it is expected to be small. In passing, we clarify the role of boundary terms in the $ζ$ action, the order to which constraint equations need to be solved, and re-derive our results using the Wheeler-deWitt formalism.
