Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Full top quark mass dependence in Higgs boson pair production at NLO

S. Borowka, N. Greiner, G. Heinrich, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk, T. Zirke

TL;DR

The authors deliver the first fully differential NLO calculation of Higgs boson pair production via gluon fusion that retains the exact top-quark mass dependence. By comparing to HEFT-based approximations and performing a 1/mt^2 expansion, they show substantial differences, with mass effects reaching up to 50% in differential tails and a global cross-section reduction of about 14% at 14 TeV and 24% at 100 TeV relative to Born-improved HEFT. The study also probes how the Higgs self-coupling λ_hhh shapes both total rates and kinematic distributions, highlighting strong interference effects and potential discriminants for non-SM scenarios. These results underscore the necessity of using full mt-dependent NLO predictions for precise Higgs physics and set the stage for combining with NNLO HEFT results to improve accuracy.

Abstract

We study the effects of the exact top-quark mass dependent two-loop corrections to Higgs boson pair production by gluon fusion at the LHC and at a 100 TeV hadron collider. We perform a detailed comparison of the full next-to-leading order result to various approximations at the level of differential distributions and also analyse non-standard Higgs self-coupling scenarios. We find that the different next-to-leading order approximations differ from the full result by up to 50 percent in relevant differential distributions. This clearly stresses the importance of the full NLO result.

Full top quark mass dependence in Higgs boson pair production at NLO

TL;DR

The authors deliver the first fully differential NLO calculation of Higgs boson pair production via gluon fusion that retains the exact top-quark mass dependence. By comparing to HEFT-based approximations and performing a 1/mt^2 expansion, they show substantial differences, with mass effects reaching up to 50% in differential tails and a global cross-section reduction of about 14% at 14 TeV and 24% at 100 TeV relative to Born-improved HEFT. The study also probes how the Higgs self-coupling λ_hhh shapes both total rates and kinematic distributions, highlighting strong interference effects and potential discriminants for non-SM scenarios. These results underscore the necessity of using full mt-dependent NLO predictions for precise Higgs physics and set the stage for combining with NNLO HEFT results to improve accuracy.

Abstract

We study the effects of the exact top-quark mass dependent two-loop corrections to Higgs boson pair production by gluon fusion at the LHC and at a 100 TeV hadron collider. We perform a detailed comparison of the full next-to-leading order result to various approximations at the level of differential distributions and also analyse non-standard Higgs self-coupling scenarios. We find that the different next-to-leading order approximations differ from the full result by up to 50 percent in relevant differential distributions. This clearly stresses the importance of the full NLO result.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 42 equations, 14 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: Diagrams contributing to the process $gg\to hh$ at leading order.
  • Figure 2: Examples of two-loop diagrams entering the virtual amplitude.
  • Figure 3: Examples of diagrams contributing to the real radiation part at NLO. The diagrams in the second row do not lead to infrared singularities.
  • Figure 4: Comparison of the virtual part as defined in Eq. (\ref{['eq:V+I']}) with full top-quark mass dependence to various orders in a $1/m_t^{2}$ expansion. $V^\prime_N$ denotes the Born-improved HEFT result to order $N$ in the $1/m_t^{2}$ expansion, i.e. $V^\prime_N=V_N\,B_{FT}/B_N$. The results for the orders $N=4,5,6$ have been provided to us by Jens Hoff Grigo:2015dia.
  • Figure 5: Higgs boson pair invariant mass distribution $m_{hh}$ at $\sqrt{s}=14$ TeV and $\sqrt{s}=100$ TeV for absolute values (left panels) and normalised to the corresponding total cross section (right panels).
  • ...and 9 more figures