Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the existence of non-hyperbolic ergodic measures as the limit of periodic measures

Christian Bonatti, Jinhua Zhang

Abstract

[GIKN] and [BBD1] propose two very different ways for building non hyperbolic measures, [GIKN] building such a measure as the limit of periodic measures and [BBD1] as the $ω$-limit set of a single orbit, with a uniformly vanishing Lyapunov exponent. The technique in [GIKN] was essentially used in a generic setting, as the periodic orbits were built by small perturbations. It is not known if the measures obtained by the technique in [BBD1] are accumulated by periodic measures. In this paper we use a shadowing lemma from [G]: $\bullet$for getting the periodic orbits in [GIKN] without perturbing the dynamics, $\bullet$for recovering the compact set in [BBD1] with a uniformly vanishing Lyapunov exponent by considering the limit of periodic orbits. As a consequence, we prove that there exists an open and dense subset $\mathcal{U}$ of the set of robustly transitive non-hyperbolic diffeomorphisms far from homoclinic tangencies, such that for any $f\in\mathcal{U}$, there exists a non-hyperbolic ergodic measure with full support and approximated by hyperbolic periodic measures. We also prove that there exists an open and dense subset $\mathcal{V}$ of the set of diffeomorphisms exhibiting a robust cycle, such that for any $f\in\mathcal{V}$, there exists a non-hyperbolic ergodic measure approximated by hyperbolic periodic measures.

On the existence of non-hyperbolic ergodic measures as the limit of periodic measures

Abstract

[GIKN] and [BBD1] propose two very different ways for building non hyperbolic measures, [GIKN] building such a measure as the limit of periodic measures and [BBD1] as the -limit set of a single orbit, with a uniformly vanishing Lyapunov exponent. The technique in [GIKN] was essentially used in a generic setting, as the periodic orbits were built by small perturbations. It is not known if the measures obtained by the technique in [BBD1] are accumulated by periodic measures. In this paper we use a shadowing lemma from [G]: for getting the periodic orbits in [GIKN] without perturbing the dynamics, for recovering the compact set in [BBD1] with a uniformly vanishing Lyapunov exponent by considering the limit of periodic orbits. As a consequence, we prove that there exists an open and dense subset of the set of robustly transitive non-hyperbolic diffeomorphisms far from homoclinic tangencies, such that for any , there exists a non-hyperbolic ergodic measure with full support and approximated by hyperbolic periodic measures. We also prove that there exists an open and dense subset of the set of diffeomorphisms exhibiting a robust cycle, such that for any , there exists a non-hyperbolic ergodic measure approximated by hyperbolic periodic measures.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 20 sections, 24 theorems, 104 equations.

Key Result

Theorem \oldthetheorem

There exists an open and dense subset $\tilde{\mathcal{T}}(M)$ of $\mathcal{T}(M)$, such that for any $f\in\tilde{\mathcal{T}}(M)$, there exist $k$ non-hyperbolic ergodic measures $\mu_1,\cdots,\mu_k$ such that for any $i=1,\cdots,k$, we have that

Theorems & Definitions (51)

  • Remark \oldthetheorem
  • Theorem \oldthetheorem
  • Theorem A
  • Theorem B
  • Remark \oldthetheorem
  • Theorem C
  • Definition \oldthetheorem
  • Definition \oldthetheorem
  • Lemma \oldthetheorem
  • Remark \oldthetheorem
  • ...and 41 more