Cosmology and the neutrino mass ordering
Steen Hannestad, Thomas Schwetz
TL;DR
This paper tackles whether cosmological measurements can exclude the inverted neutrino mass ordering (IO). It introduces a Bayesian framework to compute the posterior odds for NO versus IO by marginalizing over cosmological parameters and the lightest neutrino mass, using data such as Planck CMB and large-scale structure. Applying the method to current Planck+BAO+$H_0$ within a $\Lambda$CDM+$\Sigma$ model yields $\Sigma < 0.14$ eV (95% CL) and modest IO discrimination ($p_I \sim 0.35$–$0.392$, depending on priors). Forecasts for EUCLID-like data suggest $\Sigma = 0.060 \pm 0.021$ eV and $p_I \approx 0.08$ (NO:IO ≈ 12:1), indicating that future cosmology could robustly favor NO. The work provides a principled, combineable framework to integrate cosmology with oscillation results and to report statistically meaningful evidence about the neutrino mass ordering.
Abstract
We propose a simple method to quantify a possible exclusion of the inverted neutrino mass ordering from cosmological bounds on the sum of the neutrino masses. The method is based on Bayesian inference and allows for a calculation of the posterior odds of normal versus inverted ordering. We apply the method for a specific set of current data from Planck CMB data and large-scale structure surveys, providing an upper bound on the sum of neutrino masses of 0.14 eV at 95% CL. With this analysis we obtain posterior odds for normal versus inverted ordering of about 2:1. If cosmological data is combined with data from oscillation experiments the odds reduce to about 3:2. For an exclusion of the inverted ordering from cosmology at more than 95% CL, an accuracy of better than 0.02 eV is needed for the sum. We demonstrate that such a value could be reached with planned observations of large scale structure by analysing artificial mock data for a EUCLID-like survey.
