Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Extending the scope of holographic mutual information and chaotic behavior

Nilanjan Sircar, Jacob Sonnenschein, Walter Tangarife

TL;DR

The paper investigates scrambling and chaotic dynamics in holographic systems beyond AdS/CFT by studying entanglement entropy disruption in three classes: non-conformal Dp-brane backgrounds, asymptotically Lifshitz black holes, and Gauss-Bonnet gravity. By computing mutual information and tracing its evolution under shock-wave perturbations, the authors extract scrambling times and analyze extremal surfaces for half-plane regions, revealing that non-conformal and Lifshitz theories largely mimic conformal behavior, while Gauss-Bonnet gravity with negative coupling exhibits anomalous cusp/discontinuities that may indicate inconsistencies. The work provides a unified holographic framework for evaluating information scrambling across diverse geometries and highlights how higher-curvature corrections can qualitatively alter chaotic dynamics. These results deepen our understanding of fast scrambling in strongly coupled field theories and offer guidance for exploring higher-derivative gravity theories in holography.

Abstract

We extend the use of holography to investigate the scrambling properties of various physical systems. Specifically, we consider: (i) non-conformal backgrounds of black $Dp$ branes, (ii) asymptotically Lifshitz black holes, and (iii) black $AdS$ solutions of Gauss-Bonnet gravity. We use the disruption of the entanglement entropy as a probe of the chaotic features of such systems. Our analysis shows that these theories share the same type of behavior as conformal theories as they undergo chaos; however, in the case of Gauss-Bonnet gravity, we find a stark difference in the evolution of the mutual information for negative Gauss-Bonnet coupling. This may signal an inconsistency of the latter.

Extending the scope of holographic mutual information and chaotic behavior

TL;DR

The paper investigates scrambling and chaotic dynamics in holographic systems beyond AdS/CFT by studying entanglement entropy disruption in three classes: non-conformal Dp-brane backgrounds, asymptotically Lifshitz black holes, and Gauss-Bonnet gravity. By computing mutual information and tracing its evolution under shock-wave perturbations, the authors extract scrambling times and analyze extremal surfaces for half-plane regions, revealing that non-conformal and Lifshitz theories largely mimic conformal behavior, while Gauss-Bonnet gravity with negative coupling exhibits anomalous cusp/discontinuities that may indicate inconsistencies. The work provides a unified holographic framework for evaluating information scrambling across diverse geometries and highlights how higher-curvature corrections can qualitatively alter chaotic dynamics. These results deepen our understanding of fast scrambling in strongly coupled field theories and offer guidance for exploring higher-derivative gravity theories in holography.

Abstract

We extend the use of holography to investigate the scrambling properties of various physical systems. Specifically, we consider: (i) non-conformal backgrounds of black branes, (ii) asymptotically Lifshitz black holes, and (iii) black solutions of Gauss-Bonnet gravity. We use the disruption of the entanglement entropy as a probe of the chaotic features of such systems. Our analysis shows that these theories share the same type of behavior as conformal theories as they undergo chaos; however, in the case of Gauss-Bonnet gravity, we find a stark difference in the evolution of the mutual information for negative Gauss-Bonnet coupling. This may signal an inconsistency of the latter.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 22 sections, 122 equations, 14 figures.

Figures (14)

  • Figure 1: The geometry of an eternal black hole under the perturbation of a shock wave.
  • Figure 2: Left: Examples of $I(A,B)$ for $r_H/\ell\,=\,1$, for different values of $p$. Right: Critical values of $L$ for which $I(A,B)$ vanishes, in units of temperature.
  • Figure 3: The minimal surface
  • Figure 4: $\alpha$ as a function of $\frac{r_0}{r_h}$ at any temperature.
  • Figure 5: Left: $I(A;B)$ as a function of $\alpha$ for various $p$ branes for $L= .4 \beta$. Right: $\alpha_*$ as a function of horizon radius, in units of $\ell$.
  • ...and 9 more figures