Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hyperbolic actions and 2nd bounded cohomology of subgroups of $\text{Out}(F_n)$. Part I: Infinite lamination subgroups

Michael Handel, Lee Mosher

TL;DR

The paper proves that every finitely generated subgroup Γ of Out$(F_n)$ either is virtually abelian or has $H^2_b(Γ;\mathbb{R})$ containing an embedded $\ell^1$, by developing a WWPD-based framework and applying it to infinite lamination subgroups via actions on the free splitting complex ${\mathcal FS}(F_n)$. Part I establishes the general WWPD construction and the reduction to infinite lamination subgroups, while Part II completes the $H^2_b$-cohomology analysis (Theorem C). The methodology combines lamination ping-pong, relative train track technology, and a global WWPD property to produce free subgroups with WWPD actions and to derive unbounded quasimorphisms, feeding into Burger–Monod-type bounds. The results illuminate how hyperbolic actions and lamination dynamics govern the bounded cohomology of subgroups of Out$(F_n)$, with applications to rigidity phenomena for representations into Out$(F_n)$ and Bridson–Wade-type constraints. The framework offers a path to remove finite-generation hypotheses in later work and demonstrates the power of WWPD techniques beyond previously understood settings in Out$(F_n)$ and related groups.

Abstract

In this two part work we prove that for every finitely generated subgroup $Γ< \text{Out}(F_n)$, either $Γ$ is virtually abelian or $H^2_b(Γ;\mathbb{R})$ contains an embedding of $\ell^1$. The method uses actions on hyperbolic spaces, for purposes of constructing quasimorphisms. Here in Part I, after presenting the general theory, we focus on the case of infinite lamination subgroups $Γ$ - those for which the set of all attracting laminations of all elements of $Γ$ is infinite - using actions on free splitting complexes of free groups.

Hyperbolic actions and 2nd bounded cohomology of subgroups of $\text{Out}(F_n)$. Part I: Infinite lamination subgroups

TL;DR

The paper proves that every finitely generated subgroup Γ of Out either is virtually abelian or has containing an embedded , by developing a WWPD-based framework and applying it to infinite lamination subgroups via actions on the free splitting complex . Part I establishes the general WWPD construction and the reduction to infinite lamination subgroups, while Part II completes the -cohomology analysis (Theorem C). The methodology combines lamination ping-pong, relative train track technology, and a global WWPD property to produce free subgroups with WWPD actions and to derive unbounded quasimorphisms, feeding into Burger–Monod-type bounds. The results illuminate how hyperbolic actions and lamination dynamics govern the bounded cohomology of subgroups of Out, with applications to rigidity phenomena for representations into Out and Bridson–Wade-type constraints. The framework offers a path to remove finite-generation hypotheses in later work and demonstrates the power of WWPD techniques beyond previously understood settings in Out and related groups.

Abstract

In this two part work we prove that for every finitely generated subgroup , either is virtually abelian or contains an embedding of . The method uses actions on hyperbolic spaces, for purposes of constructing quasimorphisms. Here in Part I, after presenting the general theory, we focus on the case of infinite lamination subgroups - those for which the set of all attracting laminations of all elements of is infinite - using actions on free splitting complexes of free groups.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 33 sections, 27 theorems, 49 equations.

Key Result

Corollary 1

If $\Gamma$ is an irreducible lattice in a connected, semisimple Lie group of real rank $\ge 2$ having finite center, then every homomorphism $h \colon \Gamma \to \mathop{\mathrm{\mathsf{Out}}}\nolimits(F_n)$ has finite image.

Theorems & Definitions (56)

  • Corollary : BridsonWade:ActionsOnFreeGroups
  • proof
  • Definition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof : Proof of Lemma \ref{['LemmaCosetWWPD']}
  • Proposition 2.3: HandelMosher:WWPD
  • Proposition 2.4: HandelMosher:WWPD
  • Lemma 2.5
  • proof
  • Corollary 3.1
  • ...and 46 more