Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Faithful actions of locally compact quantum groups on classical spaces

Debashish Goswami, Sutanu Roy

Abstract

It is well-known that no non-Kac compact quantum group can faithfully act on $C(X)$ for a classical, compact Hausdorff space $X$. However, in this article we show that this is no longer true if we go to non-compact spaces and non-compact quantum groups, by exhibiting a large class of examples of locally compact quantum groups coming from bicrossed product construction, including non-Kac ones, which can faithfully and ergodically act on classical (non-compact) spaces. However, none of these actions can be isometric in the sense of Goswami, leading to the conjecture that the result obtained by Goswami and Joardar about non-existence of genuine quantum isometry of classical compact connected Riemannian manifolds may hold in the non-compact case as well.

Faithful actions of locally compact quantum groups on classical spaces

Abstract

It is well-known that no non-Kac compact quantum group can faithfully act on for a classical, compact Hausdorff space . However, in this article we show that this is no longer true if we go to non-compact spaces and non-compact quantum groups, by exhibiting a large class of examples of locally compact quantum groups coming from bicrossed product construction, including non-Kac ones, which can faithfully and ergodically act on classical (non-compact) spaces. However, none of these actions can be isometric in the sense of Goswami, leading to the conjecture that the result obtained by Goswami and Joardar about non-existence of genuine quantum isometry of classical compact connected Riemannian manifolds may hold in the non-compact case as well.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 10 theorems, 39 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 3.1

There is a $\mathrm C^*$-action of $\mathbb G$ on $\textup{C}_0(\widehat{G_{1}})$.

Theorems & Definitions (27)

  • Definition 2.2: Kustermans-Vaes:LCQG*Definition 4.1
  • Definition 2.7
  • Definition 2.10
  • Definition 2.11: Vaes-Vainerman:Extension_of_lcqg*Definition 4.7
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3.5
  • proof
  • Proposition 3.6
  • ...and 17 more