Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Production of two charm quark-antiquark pairs in single-parton scattering within the $k_t$-factorization approach

Andreas van Hameren, Rafal Maciula, Antoni Szczurek

TL;DR

This paper extends SPS calculations for pp -> ccbar ccbar X into the kt-factorization framework, using the KMR UGDF to effectively incorporate higher-order gluon emissions. It provides the first fully kt-factorized 2->4 calculation with two off-shell initial gluons and compares results to collinear-factorization predictions. The results show cross sections are only modestly larger than the collinear case, but transverse gluon momenta lead to strong azimuthal decorrelations between the two charm-quark pairs. Comparisons with DPS expectations and LHCb data indicate that treating the two DPS subprocesses as fully independent may be overly simplistic, underscoring the SPS contribution as a crucial irreducible background.

Abstract

We present first results for the $2 \to 4$ single-parton scattering $g g \to c \bar c c \bar c$ subprocess for the first time fully within the $k_t$-factorization approach. In this calculation we have used the Kimber-Martin-Ryskin unintegrated gluon distribution which effectively includes some class of higher-order gluon emissions, and an off-shell matrix element squared calculated using recently developed techniques. The results are compared with our earlier result obtained within the collinear-factorization approach. Only slightly larger cross sections are obtained than in the case of the collinear approach. Inclusion of transverse momenta of gluons entering the hard process leads to a much stronger azimuthal decorrelation between $c c$ and $\bar c \bar c$ than in the collinear-factorization approach. A comparison to predictions of double parton scattering (DPS) results and the LHCb data strongly suggests that the assumption of two fully independent DPS ($g g \to c \bar c \otimes g g \to c \bar c$) may be too approximate.

Production of two charm quark-antiquark pairs in single-parton scattering within the $k_t$-factorization approach

TL;DR

This paper extends SPS calculations for pp -> ccbar ccbar X into the kt-factorization framework, using the KMR UGDF to effectively incorporate higher-order gluon emissions. It provides the first fully kt-factorized 2->4 calculation with two off-shell initial gluons and compares results to collinear-factorization predictions. The results show cross sections are only modestly larger than the collinear case, but transverse gluon momenta lead to strong azimuthal decorrelations between the two charm-quark pairs. Comparisons with DPS expectations and LHCb data indicate that treating the two DPS subprocesses as fully independent may be overly simplistic, underscoring the SPS contribution as a crucial irreducible background.

Abstract

We present first results for the single-parton scattering subprocess for the first time fully within the -factorization approach. In this calculation we have used the Kimber-Martin-Ryskin unintegrated gluon distribution which effectively includes some class of higher-order gluon emissions, and an off-shell matrix element squared calculated using recently developed techniques. The results are compared with our earlier result obtained within the collinear-factorization approach. Only slightly larger cross sections are obtained than in the case of the collinear approach. Inclusion of transverse momenta of gluons entering the hard process leads to a much stronger azimuthal decorrelation between and than in the collinear-factorization approach. A comparison to predictions of double parton scattering (DPS) results and the LHCb data strongly suggests that the assumption of two fully independent DPS () may be too approximate.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 sections, 2 equations, 2 figures.

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Formalism

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: A diagrammatic representation of the considered mechanism of $c \bar{c} c \bar{c}$ final-state production via single-parton scattering within $k_{t}$-factorization approach.
  • Figure :