Distinguishing interacting dark energy from wCDM with CMB, lensing, and baryon acoustic oscillation data
Jussi Valiviita, Elina Palmgren
TL;DR
This paper investigates whether Planck 2013 CMB data, including lensing and BAO, can distinguish interacting dark energy from a non-interacting $w$CDM model by introducing a phenomenological background coupling $Q_c=-\Gamma\rho_c$ and a time-varying dark-energy equation of state $w_{\mathrm{de}}(t)$. Using full perturbation theory and MCMC with CosmoMC, the authors find that non-phantom models ( $w_{\mathrm{de}}> -1$ ) show no evidence for interaction, with $-0.14<\Gamma/H_0<0.02$ at 95% CL after CMB+BAO+lensing; BAO is crucial to break the CMB degeneracy. In phantom models ($w_{\mathrm{de}}<-1$), energy transfer from DE to DM is modestly favored by CMB+BAO data ($-0.57<\Gamma/H_0<-0.10$), and lensing shifts this to $-0.46<\Gamma/H_0<-0.01$, while also inducing strong shifts in $\omega_c$ and $\Omega_{\mathrm{de}}$. Overall, lensing data enhance the ability to discriminate between interacting and non-interacting scenarios, highlighting the potential of future surveys to probe dark-sector couplings through growth and ISW-related observables.
Abstract
We employ the Planck 2013 CMB temperature anisotropy and lensing data, and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data to constrain a phenomenological $w$CDM model, where dark matter and dark energy interact. We assume time-dependent equation of state parameter for dark energy, and treat dark matter and dark energy as fluids whose energy-exchange rate is proportional to the dark-matter density. The CMB data alone leave a strong degeneracy between the interaction rate and the physical CDM density parameter today, $ω_c$, allowing a large interaction rate $|Γ| \sim H_0$. However, as has been known for a while, the BAO data break this degeneracy. Moreover, we exploit the CMB lensing potential likelihood, which probes the matter perturbations at redshift $z \sim 2$ and is very sensitive to the growth of structure, and hence one of the tools for discerning between the $Λ$CDM model and its alternatives. However, we find that in the non-phantom models ($w_{\mathrm{de}}>-1$), the constraints remain unchanged by the inclusion of the lensing data and consistent with zero interaction, $-0.14 < Γ/H_0 < 0.02$ at 95\% CL. On the contrary, in the phantom models ($w_{\mathrm{de}}<-1$), energy transfer from dark energy to dark matter is moderately favoured over the non-interacting model; $-0.57 < Γ/H_0 < -0.10$ at 95\% CL with CMB+BAO, while addition of the lensing data shifts this to $-0.46 < Γ/H_0 < -0.01$.
