Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quotients of polynomial rings and regular t-balanced Cayley maps on abelian groups

Haimiao Chen

TL;DR

This paper clarifies a connection between quotients of polynomial rings and RBCM$_{t}$'s on abelian groups, so as to propose a new approach for classifying R BCM$_t} $'s, and obtains many new results.

Abstract

Given a finite group $Γ$, a regular $t$-balanced Cayley map (RBCM$_{t}$ for short) is a regular Cayley map $\mathcal{CM}(G,Ω,ρ)$ such that $ρ(ω)^{-1}=ρ^{t}(ω)$ for all $ω\inΩ$. In this paper, we clarify a connection between quotients of polynomial rings and RBCM$_{t}$'s on abelian groups, so as to propose a new approach for classifying RBCM$_{t}$'s. We obtain many new results, in particular, a complete classification for RBCM$_{t}$'s on abelian 2-groups.

Quotients of polynomial rings and regular t-balanced Cayley maps on abelian groups

TL;DR

This paper clarifies a connection between quotients of polynomial rings and RBCM's on abelian groups, so as to propose a new approach for classifying R BCM's, and obtains many new results.

Abstract

Given a finite group , a regular -balanced Cayley map (RBCM for short) is a regular Cayley map such that for all . In this paper, we clarify a connection between quotients of polynomial rings and RBCM's on abelian groups, so as to propose a new approach for classifying RBCM's. We obtain many new results, in particular, a complete classification for RBCM's on abelian 2-groups.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 10 theorems, 93 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.2

(a) A Cayley map $\mathcal{CM}(\Gamma,\Omega,\rho)$ is a RBCM$_{1}$ if and only if $\rho$ can be extended to an automorphism of $\Gamma$. (b) Suppose $1<t<|\Omega|$. A Cayley map $\mathcal{CM}(\Gamma,\Omega,\rho)$ is a RBCM$_{t}$ if and only if $\pi(\omega)=t$ for all $\omega\in\Omega$ and $\pi(\eta

Theorems & Definitions (21)

  • Proposition 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Remark 1.4
  • Theorem 2.1
  • proof
  • Remark 3.2
  • Proposition 3.4
  • Example 3.5
  • Proposition 3.6
  • proof
  • ...and 11 more