Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Unitarity in three-dimensional flat space higher spin theories

D. Grumiller, M. Riegler, J. Rosseel

TL;DR

We study unitarity constraints for 3D flat-space higher-spin theories and find a no-go: for generic non-linear $\mathcal{W}$-algebras arising from contractions of AdS higher-spin symmetries, insisting on unitarity forces $c_M\to0$ and decouples the higher-spin content. This no-go applies to principal embeddings and many non-principal contractions, though a linear counterexample exists via a flat-space contraction of the linear $\mathcal{W}_\infty$ (hs$(1)$) sector, which can be unitary with non-trivial HS states. A second line of results shows that certain non-linear contracted algebras (e.g., GB-style and PB-type) admit tight central-charge bounds that further constrain unitary representations, sometimes eliminating multi-graviton excitations. The Yes-go is realized by linear flat-space HS algebras built from contractions of $\mathcal{W}_\infty$ (or $\mathcal{W}_{1+\infty}$), where unitarity is compatible with non-trivial HS content, suggesting that flat-space chiral higher-spin gravity may exist in a linearized framework. Overall, the work clarifies when flat-space higher-spin theories can be unitary and points to linearized or chiral constructions as viable directions for consistent theories with HS content.

Abstract

We investigate generic flat-space higher spin theories in three dimensions and find a no-go result, given certain assumptions that we spell out. Namely, it is only possible to have at most two out of the following three properties: unitarity, flat space, non-trivial higher spin states. Interestingly, unitarity provides an (algebra-dependent) upper bound on the central charge, like c=42 for the Galilean $W_4^{(2-1-1)}$ algebra. We extend this no-go result to rule out unitary "multi-graviton" theories in flat space. We also provide an example circumventing the no-go result: Vasiliev-type flat space higher spin theory based on hs(1) can be unitary and simultaneously allow for non-trivial higher-spin states in the dual field theory.

Unitarity in three-dimensional flat space higher spin theories

TL;DR

We study unitarity constraints for 3D flat-space higher-spin theories and find a no-go: for generic non-linear -algebras arising from contractions of AdS higher-spin symmetries, insisting on unitarity forces and decouples the higher-spin content. This no-go applies to principal embeddings and many non-principal contractions, though a linear counterexample exists via a flat-space contraction of the linear (hs) sector, which can be unitary with non-trivial HS states. A second line of results shows that certain non-linear contracted algebras (e.g., GB-style and PB-type) admit tight central-charge bounds that further constrain unitary representations, sometimes eliminating multi-graviton excitations. The Yes-go is realized by linear flat-space HS algebras built from contractions of (or ), where unitarity is compatible with non-trivial HS content, suggesting that flat-space chiral higher-spin gravity may exist in a linearized framework. Overall, the work clarifies when flat-space higher-spin theories can be unitary and points to linearized or chiral constructions as viable directions for consistent theories with HS content.

Abstract

We investigate generic flat-space higher spin theories in three dimensions and find a no-go result, given certain assumptions that we spell out. Namely, it is only possible to have at most two out of the following three properties: unitarity, flat space, non-trivial higher spin states. Interestingly, unitarity provides an (algebra-dependent) upper bound on the central charge, like c=42 for the Galilean algebra. We extend this no-go result to rule out unitary "multi-graviton" theories in flat space. We also provide an example circumventing the no-go result: Vasiliev-type flat space higher spin theory based on hs(1) can be unitary and simultaneously allow for non-trivial higher-spin states in the dual field theory.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 90 equations.