Higgs Boson Cross Section from CTEQ-TEA Global Analysis
Sayipjamal Dulat, Tie-Jiun Hou, Jun Gao, Joey Huston, Pavel Nadolsky, Jon Pumplin, Carl Schmidt, Daniel Stump, C. -P. Yuan
TL;DR
This work quantifies the uncertainties in the Higgs boson production cross section through gluon fusion arising from parton distribution functions and the strong coupling $α_s(M_Z)$ within the CT10H NNLO global analysis. It benchmarks two uncertainty-estimation approaches, the Hessian method and the Lagrange multiplier method, finding substantial agreement in the predicted cross sections at $\sqrt{s}=7,8,$ and $14$ TeV and in the combined PDF+$α_s$ uncertainties, thereby validating the common practice of adding PDF and $α_s$ errors in quadrature. The analysis reveals a strong correlation between $σ_H$ and the gluon PDF around $x\sim 0.01$ and highlights the anti-correlation between the gluon-initiated Higgs channel and the vector boson fusion channel. The LM approach provides a complementary cross-check and yields detailed correlations and extreme PDFs that facilitate robust uncertainty propagation for Higgs phenomenology at the LHC, with the CT10H extensions incorporating LHC data to tighten gluon-PDF constraints. Overall, the results support using the Hessian framework for practical Higgs cross-section uncertainty estimates while offering LM-based validation and insight into the underlying correlations.
Abstract
We study the uncertainties of the Higgs boson production cross section through the gluon fusion subprocess at the LHC (with $\sqrt s=7, 8$ and $14$ TeV) arising from the uncertainties of the parton distribution functions (PDFs) and of the value of the strong coupling constant $α_s(M_Z)$. These uncertainties are computed by two complementary approaches, based on the Hessian and the Lagrange Multiplier methods within the CTEQ-TEA global analysis framework. We find that their predictions for the Higgs boson cross section are in good agreement. Furthermore, the result of the Lagrange Multiplier method supports the prescriptions we have previously provided for using the Hessian method to calculate the combined PDF and $α_s$ uncertainties, and to estimate the uncertainties at the $68\%$ confidence level by scaling them from the $90\%$ confidence level.
