Table of Contents
Fetching ...

A Note on the Magnitude of the Flux Superpotential

Michele Cicoli, Joseph P. Conlon, Anshuman Maharana, Fernando Quevedo

TL;DR

This note reevaluates the traditional requirement of a tiny flux superpotential $W_0$ in IIB compactifications. It shows, via three independent analyses, that heavy–light couplings between Kaluza–Klein modes and light fields are suppressed as $g \sim \mathcal{V}^{-2/3}$, so the EFT consistency condition becomes $W_0/\mathcal{V}^{1/3} \ll 1$, a mild constraint easily satisfied at large volume. Consequently, order-one $W_0$ values are natural, especially in the Large Volume Scenario (LVS), and actually enhance the efficiency of Bousso–Polchinski-type tuning for the cosmological constant; small $W_0$ is not a general necessity for phenomenology or EFT validity. The work also contrasts KKLT and LVS, highlighting that LVS does not require $W_0$ to be small to yield viable moduli stabilization or TeV-scale soft terms, with the gravitino mass set by $m_{3/2} \sim e^{K/2}W_0 \sim W_0 M_P/\mathcal{V}$.

Abstract

The magnitude of the flux superpotential $W_{flux}$ plays a crucial role in determining the scales of IIB string compactifications after moduli stabilisation. It has been argued that values of $W_{flux}$ much less than one are preferred, and even required for physical and consistency reasons. This note revisits these arguments. We establish that the coupling (g) of heavy Kaluza-Klein modes to light states scales as ${M_{KK} / M_{Pl}}$ (hence is suppressed by two third powers of the inverse volume of compactification) and argue that consistency of the superspace derivative expansion requires $gF/M^2 \sim m_{3/2}/ M_{KK} << 1$, where $F$ is the auxiliary field of the light fields and $M$ the ultraviolet cutoff. This gives only a mild constraint on the flux superpotential, $W_{flux} << V^{1/3}$ (where V is the volume of the compactification), which can be easily satisfied for order one values of $W_{flux}$. This regime is also statistically favoured and makes the Bousso-Polchinski mechanism for the vacuum energy hierarchically more efficient.

A Note on the Magnitude of the Flux Superpotential

TL;DR

This note reevaluates the traditional requirement of a tiny flux superpotential in IIB compactifications. It shows, via three independent analyses, that heavy–light couplings between Kaluza–Klein modes and light fields are suppressed as , so the EFT consistency condition becomes , a mild constraint easily satisfied at large volume. Consequently, order-one values are natural, especially in the Large Volume Scenario (LVS), and actually enhance the efficiency of Bousso–Polchinski-type tuning for the cosmological constant; small is not a general necessity for phenomenology or EFT validity. The work also contrasts KKLT and LVS, highlighting that LVS does not require to be small to yield viable moduli stabilization or TeV-scale soft terms, with the gravitino mass set by .

Abstract

The magnitude of the flux superpotential plays a crucial role in determining the scales of IIB string compactifications after moduli stabilisation. It has been argued that values of much less than one are preferred, and even required for physical and consistency reasons. This note revisits these arguments. We establish that the coupling (g) of heavy Kaluza-Klein modes to light states scales as (hence is suppressed by two third powers of the inverse volume of compactification) and argue that consistency of the superspace derivative expansion requires , where is the auxiliary field of the light fields and the ultraviolet cutoff. This gives only a mild constraint on the flux superpotential, (where V is the volume of the compactification), which can be easily satisfied for order one values of . This regime is also statistically favoured and makes the Bousso-Polchinski mechanism for the vacuum energy hierarchically more efficient.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 37 equations.