Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Multiplicity one for $L$-functions and applications

David W. Farmer, Ameya Pitale, Nathan C. Ryan, Ralf Schmidt

TL;DR

The work develops strong multiplicity one theorems for analytic L-functions defined by Dirichlet series with Euler products and a functional equation, under weaker Ramanujan-type hypotheses and with averages of prime coefficients replacing pointwise equalities. It systematizes lifts via symmetric/exterior powers and Rankin–Selberg products, building a framework to compare two L-functions through a ratio of completed L-functions and a control of zeros on the critical line. The main contributions include general theorems ensuring L1(s)=L2(s) from near-coincidence of coefficients on primes, plus variants that handle partial Ramanujan bounds and lifts; the approach also clarifies how information from lifts constrains the analytic behavior. When arithmetic sources are known, the results yield stronger multiplicity-one conclusions, especially under Selberg orthogonality-type hypotheses for automorphic L-functions. The paper also demonstrates concrete applications to automorphic GL(n) representations and Siegel paramodular forms, illustrating that close prime-coefficient data forces equality of the underlying arithmetic objects or their Hecke data.

Abstract

We give conditions for when two Euler products are the same given that they satisfy a functional equation and their coefficients are not too large and do not differ from each other by too much. Additionally, we prove a number of multiplicity one type results for the number-theoretic objects attached to $L$-functions. These results follow from our main result, which has slightly weaker hypotheses than previous multiplicity one theorems for $L$-functions. Significantly stronger results are available when the L-function is known to be automorphic.

Multiplicity one for $L$-functions and applications

TL;DR

The work develops strong multiplicity one theorems for analytic L-functions defined by Dirichlet series with Euler products and a functional equation, under weaker Ramanujan-type hypotheses and with averages of prime coefficients replacing pointwise equalities. It systematizes lifts via symmetric/exterior powers and Rankin–Selberg products, building a framework to compare two L-functions through a ratio of completed L-functions and a control of zeros on the critical line. The main contributions include general theorems ensuring L1(s)=L2(s) from near-coincidence of coefficients on primes, plus variants that handle partial Ramanujan bounds and lifts; the approach also clarifies how information from lifts constrains the analytic behavior. When arithmetic sources are known, the results yield stronger multiplicity-one conclusions, especially under Selberg orthogonality-type hypotheses for automorphic L-functions. The paper also demonstrates concrete applications to automorphic GL(n) representations and Siegel paramodular forms, illustrating that close prime-coefficient data forces equality of the underlying arithmetic objects or their Hecke data.

Abstract

We give conditions for when two Euler products are the same given that they satisfy a functional equation and their coefficients are not too large and do not differ from each other by too much. Additionally, we prove a number of multiplicity one type results for the number-theoretic objects attached to -functions. These results follow from our main result, which has slightly weaker hypotheses than previous multiplicity one theorems for -functions. Significantly stronger results are available when the L-function is known to be automorphic.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 19 sections, 15 theorems, 66 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Suppose $L_1(s)=\sum a_nn^{-s}$ and $L_2(s)=\sum b_nn^{-s}$ are Dirichlet series which continue to meromorphic functions of order $1$ satisfying appropriate functional equations and having appropriate Euler products. Assume that $L_1(s)$ and $L_2(s)$ satisfy the Ramanujan conjecture. Assume also tha

Theorems & Definitions (26)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Proposition 2.1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4
  • Theorem 2.5
  • ...and 16 more