Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Oscillations Using Beam and Atmospheric Data in MINOS

MINOS Collaboration, P. Adamson, I. Anghel, C. Backhouse, G. Barr, M. Bishai, A. Blake, G. J. Bock, D. Bogert, S. V. Cao, C. M. Castromonte, S. Childress, J. A. B. Coelho, L. Corwin, D. Cronin-Hennessy, J. K. de Jong, A. V. Devan, N. E. Devenish, M. V. Diwan, C. O. Escobar, J. J. Evans, E. Falk, G. J. Feldman, M. V. Frohne, H. R. Gallagher, R. A. Gomes, M. C. Goodman, P. Gouffon, N. Graf, R. Gran, K. Grzelak, A. Habig, S. R. Hahn, J. Hartnell, R. Hatcher, A. Himmel, A. Holin, J. Hylen, G. M. Irwin, Z. Isvan, C. James, D. Jensen, T. Kafka, S. M. S. Kasahara, G. Koizumi, M. Kordosky, A. Kreymer, K. Lang, J. Ling, P. J. Litchfield, P. Lucas, W. A. Mann, M. L. Marshak, M. Mathis, N. Mayer, A. M. McGowan, M. M. Medeiros, R. Mehdiyev, J. R. Meier, M. D. Messier, D. G. Michael, W. H. Miller, S. R. Mishra, S. Moed Sher, C. D. Moore, L. Mualem, J. Musser, D. Naples, J. K. Nelson, H. B. Newman, R. J. Nichol, J. A. Nowak, J. O'Connor, W. P. Oliver, M. Orchanian, R. B. Pahlka, J. Paley, R. B. Patterson, G. Pawloski, S. Phan-Budd, R. K. Plunkett, X. Qiu, A. Radovic, B. Rebel, C. Rosenfeld, H. A. Rubin, M. C. Sanchez, J. Schneps, A. Schreckenberger, P. Schreiner, R. Sharma, A. Sousa, N. Tagg, R. L. Talaga, J. Thomas, M. A. Thomson, G. Tinti, S. C. Tognini, R. Toner, D. Torretta, G. Tzanakos, J. Urheim, P. Vahle, B. Viren, A. Weber, R. C. Webb, C. White, L. Whitehead, L. H. Whitehead, S. G. Wojcicki, R. Zwaska

TL;DR

Measurements of oscillation parameters from ν (μ) and ν(μ) disappearance using beam and atmospheric data from MINOS are reported, with minimal change to the neutrino parameters.

Abstract

We report measurements of oscillation parameters from $ν_{mu}$ and $\barν_μ$ disappearance using beam and atmospheric data from MINOS. The data comprise exposures of \unit[$10.71 \times 10^{20}$]{protons on target (POT)} in the $ν_μ$-dominated beam, $\unit[3.36\times10^{20}]{POT}}$ in the $\barν_μ$-enhanced beam, and 37.88 kton-years of atmospheric neutrinos. Assuming identical $ν$ and $\barν$ oscillation parameters, we measure \mbox{$|Δm^2}| = \unit[2.41^{+0.09}_{-0.10}) \times 10^{-3}]{eV^{2}}$} and $\sin^{2}/!/left(2θ\right) = 0.950^{+0.035}_{-0.036}$. Allowing independent $ν$ and $\barν$ oscillations, we measure antineutrino parameters of $|Δ\bar{m}^2| = \unit[(2.50 ^{+0.23}_{-0.25}) \times 10^{-3}]{eV^{2}}$ and $\sin^{2}/!/left(2\barθ \right) = 0.97^{+0.03}_{-0.08}$, with minimal change to the neutrino parameters.

Measurement of Neutrino and Antineutrino Oscillations Using Beam and Atmospheric Data in MINOS

TL;DR

Measurements of oscillation parameters from ν (μ) and ν(μ) disappearance using beam and atmospheric data from MINOS are reported, with minimal change to the neutrino parameters.

Abstract

We report measurements of oscillation parameters from and disappearance using beam and atmospheric data from MINOS. The data comprise exposures of \unit[]{protons on target (POT)} in the -dominated beam, in the -enhanced beam, and 37.88 kton-years of atmospheric neutrinos. Assuming identical and oscillation parameters, we measure \mbox{} and . Allowing independent and oscillations, we measure antineutrino parameters of and , with minimal change to the neutrino parameters.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 equations, 3 figures, 1 table.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: FD data samples compared to predictions with and without oscillations.  The top row shows the energy spectra of the beam samples, while the bottom row shows the L/E distributions for the atmospheric event samples.
  • Figure 2: The allowed regions of $|\Delta m^2\xspace|$ and $\sin^{2}\!\left(2\theta \right)$, assuming identical neutrino and antineutrino oscillations. The MINOS result is compared to results from Super-Kamiokande ref:SKNeutrino2012 and T2K ref:T2Knucontour.
  • Figure 3: The 90% confidence level allowed region of $|\Delta m^2\xspace|$ and $\sin^{2}\!\left(2\theta \right)$ from the fit assuming identical neutrino and antineutrino oscillations (MINOS 90%, also in Fig. \ref{['fig:nu']}) is compared to the allowed regions for $\nu_{\mu}\xspace$ and $\overline{\nu}_{\mu}\xspace$ from the fit in which neutrinos and antineutrinos have different oscillation parameters.