Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Doping effect on thermoelectric properties of MoS$_2$

Huaihong Guo, Teng Yang, Peng Tao, Zhidong Zhang

TL;DR

This work addresses how doping tunes the thermoelectric performance of layered MoS$_2$. By combining EV-GGA electronic structure (via LAPW/WIEN2K) with Boltzmann transport theory (BoltzTraP) and an energy-independent scattering time, the authors compute thermopower, electrical conductivity, and thermal conductivities for in-plane and cross-plane directions. They identify an optimal hole-doping level around $1\times10^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$, reveal strong anisotropy in electrical and electronic thermal transport caused by anisotropic scattering, and predict a maximum ZT of about $0.3$ at $700$ K in the in-plane direction, with potential gains if lattice thermal conductivity is reduced (e.g., via restacking). The findings guide doping strategies and suggest that in-plane MoS$_2$ offers the most practical thermoelectric performance, highlighting the role of anisotropic scattering and the balance between $\kappa_e$ and $\kappa_l$ in engineering high efficiency materials.

Abstract

We systematically study thermoelectric properties of layered MoS$_2$ by doping, based on Boltzmann transport theory and first-principles calculations. We obtain optimal doping region (around 10$^{19}$ cm$^{-3}$) by looking closely to the temperature and doping level dependent thermopower, electrical conductivity, power factor (PF) and ultimately figure of merit (ZT) coefficient along in-plane and cross-plane directions. MoS$_2$ has a vanishingly small anisotropy of thermopower but a big anisotropy of electrical conductivity and electronic thermal conductivity in optimal doping region. $κ_e$ is comparable to $κ_l$ in the plane while $κ_l$ dominates over $κ_e$ across the plane. ZT can reach as high as 0.3 at around 700 K. In-plane direction is demonstrated to be more preferable for thermoelectric applications of MoS$_2$ by doping.

Doping effect on thermoelectric properties of MoS$_2$

TL;DR

This work addresses how doping tunes the thermoelectric performance of layered MoS. By combining EV-GGA electronic structure (via LAPW/WIEN2K) with Boltzmann transport theory (BoltzTraP) and an energy-independent scattering time, the authors compute thermopower, electrical conductivity, and thermal conductivities for in-plane and cross-plane directions. They identify an optimal hole-doping level around cm, reveal strong anisotropy in electrical and electronic thermal transport caused by anisotropic scattering, and predict a maximum ZT of about at K in the in-plane direction, with potential gains if lattice thermal conductivity is reduced (e.g., via restacking). The findings guide doping strategies and suggest that in-plane MoS offers the most practical thermoelectric performance, highlighting the role of anisotropic scattering and the balance between and in engineering high efficiency materials.

Abstract

We systematically study thermoelectric properties of layered MoS by doping, based on Boltzmann transport theory and first-principles calculations. We obtain optimal doping region (around 10 cm) by looking closely to the temperature and doping level dependent thermopower, electrical conductivity, power factor (PF) and ultimately figure of merit (ZT) coefficient along in-plane and cross-plane directions. MoS has a vanishingly small anisotropy of thermopower but a big anisotropy of electrical conductivity and electronic thermal conductivity in optimal doping region. is comparable to in the plane while dominates over across the plane. ZT can reach as high as 0.3 at around 700 K. In-plane direction is demonstrated to be more preferable for thermoelectric applications of MoS by doping.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 6 figures.

Figures (6)

  • Figure 1: (Color online) EV-GGA electronic band structure of MoS$_2$ along high-symmetry lines (a) $\Gamma$-M-K-$\Gamma$ in plane and (b) $\Gamma$-A across plane in the hexagonal Brillouin zone (BZ). The valence-band edge is set as zero and marked with a dashed line. Electronic density of states in (c) shows a comparatively higher value at the conduction band edge than at the valence band edge.
  • Figure 2: (Color online) (a) Temperature dependence of calculated in-plane thermopower S$_{xx}$ of MoS$_2$, compared with experimental data by Mansfield and Salam PPSB1953 at two doping levels p = 1.6 $\times$ 10$^{16}$ (filled triangle) and 3.4 $\times$ 10$^{16}$ (empty circle) holes per cm$^{3}$. Doping level dependence of (b) in-plane thermopower S$_{xx}$(p, T), (c) ratio of cross-plane S$_{zz}$(p, T) over in-plane S$_{xx}$(p, T) and (d) in-plane S$_{xx}(n, T)$ at different temperatures. The temperature ranges from 100K to 700K for some practical reason. Hole and electron doping are respectively used in (a-c) and (d). Experimental data with p = 7.6 $\times$ 10$^{16}$ and 1.0 $\times$ 10$^{17}$ cm$^{-3}$ at 200K by Mansfield and Salam PPSB1953 is respectively marked by filled triangle and square in (b).
  • Figure 3: (Color online) Doping level dependence of (a) in-plane $\sigma_{xx}/\tau_{xx}$, (b) in-plane electrical conductivity $\sigma_{xx}$, (c) ratio of cross-plane $\sigma_{zz}/\tau_{zz}$ over in-plane $\sigma_{xx}/\tau_{xx}$ and (d) cross-plane $\sigma_{zz}$, at different temperatures. Isotropic and anisotropic electronic scattering time $\tau$ are respectively assumed in (c), for instance, $\tau_{zz}/\tau_{xx} = 1$ and 0.024 with the anisotropic one fitting well the experimental data in blue square from Thakurta et. al. JPCS1983 and thereby used to derive $\sigma_{zz}$ in (d).
  • Figure 4: (Color online) Doping level dependence of (a) power factor $\sigma_{xx} S^2_{xx}$ and (b) $\sigma_{zz} S^2_{zz}$ of p-type MoS$_2$ at different temperatures.
  • Figure 5: (Color online) (a) In-plane electronic thermal conductivity $\kappa^e_{xx}$, (b) cross-plane $\kappa^e_{zz}$ and (c) in-plane L/L$_0$ as function of doping and temperature. L = $\kappa$/($\sigma$ T) and L$_0$ is the Lorenz number 2.44$\times$10$^{-8}$ W$\Omega$K$^{-2}$. (d) Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity $\kappa$ from experiment by Kim et. al. kappa2, which are presented by filled circles and fitted by $\kappa$ = 183.103/T + 0.412671 in dashed line.
  • ...and 1 more figures