Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Can the 126 GeV boson be a pseudoscalar?

Baradhwaj Coleppa, Kunal Kumar, Heather E. Logan

TL;DR

The paper investigates whether the 126 GeV boson could be a pseudoscalar by parameterizing its loop-induced couplings to gauge bosons with a minimal two-operator effective Lagrangian. By fitting to the observed γγ and 4ℓ rates (including substantial Zγ*→4ℓ contributions), it fixes the coupling ratio and makes sharp predictions for WW* and Zγ decays. It finds a dramatic suppression of φ→WW* and a substantial enhancement of φ→Zγ relative to the SM Higgs, implying that Zγ searches should easily exclude the pseudoscalar, while WW* measurements would also challenge it if observed near SM levels. A potential loophole remains if the 4ℓ signal arises from φ→Z′Z′ decays near the Z pole, but even then the strong WW* suppression remains a characteristic feature; overall, the pseudoscalar interpretation is disfavored but not definitively ruled out.

Abstract

We test the possibility that the newly-discovered 126 GeV boson is a pseudoscalar by examining the correlations among the loop-induced pseudoscalar decay branching fractions to $γγ$, $ZZ^*$, $Zγ$, and $WW^*$ final states in a model-independent way. These four decays are controlled by only two effective operators, so that the rates in $Zγ$ and $WW^*$ are predicted now that the rates in $γγ$ and $ZZ^*,Zγ^* \to 4 \ell$ have been measured. We find that the pseudoscalar possibility is disfavored but not conclusively excluded. Experimental exclusion of the $Zγ$ decay to well below $σ/σ_{\rm SM} \sim 170$ or conclusive observation of the $WW^*$ decay near the Standard Model rate would eliminate the pseudoscalar possibility. The $Zγ$ exclusion should be possible using existing data. The only loophole in our argument is the possibility that the $4\ell$ signal comes from pseudoscalar decays to a pair of new neutral gauge bosons with mass near the $Z$ pole.

Can the 126 GeV boson be a pseudoscalar?

TL;DR

The paper investigates whether the 126 GeV boson could be a pseudoscalar by parameterizing its loop-induced couplings to gauge bosons with a minimal two-operator effective Lagrangian. By fitting to the observed γγ and 4ℓ rates (including substantial Zγ*→4ℓ contributions), it fixes the coupling ratio and makes sharp predictions for WW* and Zγ decays. It finds a dramatic suppression of φ→WW* and a substantial enhancement of φ→Zγ relative to the SM Higgs, implying that Zγ searches should easily exclude the pseudoscalar, while WW* measurements would also challenge it if observed near SM levels. A potential loophole remains if the 4ℓ signal arises from φ→Z′Z′ decays near the Z pole, but even then the strong WW* suppression remains a characteristic feature; overall, the pseudoscalar interpretation is disfavored but not definitively ruled out.

Abstract

We test the possibility that the newly-discovered 126 GeV boson is a pseudoscalar by examining the correlations among the loop-induced pseudoscalar decay branching fractions to , , , and final states in a model-independent way. These four decays are controlled by only two effective operators, so that the rates in and are predicted now that the rates in and have been measured. We find that the pseudoscalar possibility is disfavored but not conclusively excluded. Experimental exclusion of the decay to well below or conclusive observation of the decay near the Standard Model rate would eliminate the pseudoscalar possibility. The exclusion should be possible using existing data. The only loophole in our argument is the possibility that the signal comes from pseudoscalar decays to a pair of new neutral gauge bosons with mass near the pole.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 8 sections, 13 equations, 2 figures.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Theoretical prediction for the partial widths of $\phi$ to $\gamma\gamma$ (blue), $Z\gamma$ (red), $WW^{*}$ (green), and $ZZ^{*}$ (magenta) as a function of $b$, for $M_{\phi} = 126$ GeV and $a = 1$. The normalization on the $y$-axis can be changed by varying $a$; all the partial widths shown scale with $a^2$. The vertical dotted line shows the value of $b$ that we will use to match the SM rates in $\gamma\gamma$ and $4\ell$.
  • Figure 2: Invariant mass distributions $M_{12}$ (left) and $M_{34}$ (right) for the $4e$ final state event selection (see text for definitions), after application of the $\Delta R$ cut. We show separately the contributions from $\phi \to Z\gamma^* \to 4e$ (red) and $\phi \to ZZ^* \to 4e$ (blue, multiplied by 1000). The vertical lines indicate the lower cuts on $M_{12}$ at 50 GeV and on $M_{34}$ at 20.5 GeV.