Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle

T. A. Wagner, S. Schlamminger, J. H. Gundlach, E. G. Adelberger

TL;DR

This work reviews torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle (WEP), focusing on high-precision Be–Ti and Be–Al differential accelerations that probe possible new Yukawa-type forces. By framing WEP violations as limits on vector or scalar couplings with range $\lambda$ and strength $\tilde{\alpha}$, the study combines lab-based Be–Ti/Be–Al results with lunar laser ranging to constrain long-range interactions and dilaton-like scalars, finding no evidence for WEP violation at the 10^{-13}–10^{-5} level. The results have implications for antimatter gravity and dark matter couplings, and outline pathways for substantial sensitivity improvements in future torsion-balance experiments, including higher-contrast test bodies and lower-noise suspensions. Overall, the paper strengthens limits on beyond-Newtonian forces and outlines the feasibility of tighter constraints with next-generation instrumentation.

Abstract

We briefly summarize motivations for testing the weak equivalence principle and then review recent torsion-balance results that compare the differential accelerations of beryllium-aluminum and beryllium-titanium test body pairs with precisions at the part in $10^{13}$ level. We discuss some implications of these results for the gravitational properties of antimatter and dark matter, and speculate about the prospects for further improvements in experimental sensitivity.

Torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle

TL;DR

This work reviews torsion-balance tests of the weak equivalence principle (WEP), focusing on high-precision Be–Ti and Be–Al differential accelerations that probe possible new Yukawa-type forces. By framing WEP violations as limits on vector or scalar couplings with range and strength , the study combines lab-based Be–Ti/Be–Al results with lunar laser ranging to constrain long-range interactions and dilaton-like scalars, finding no evidence for WEP violation at the 10^{-13}–10^{-5} level. The results have implications for antimatter gravity and dark matter couplings, and outline pathways for substantial sensitivity improvements in future torsion-balance experiments, including higher-contrast test bodies and lower-noise suspensions. Overall, the paper strengthens limits on beyond-Newtonian forces and outlines the feasibility of tighter constraints with next-generation instrumentation.

Abstract

We briefly summarize motivations for testing the weak equivalence principle and then review recent torsion-balance results that compare the differential accelerations of beryllium-aluminum and beryllium-titanium test body pairs with precisions at the part in level. We discuss some implications of these results for the gravitational properties of antimatter and dark matter, and speculate about the prospects for further improvements in experimental sensitivity.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 10 equations, 9 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Operating principle of the Eötvös torsion balance. This idealized balance consists of two test bodies attached to a rigid, massless frame that is supported by a perfectly flexible torsion fibre. ${\bm F_1}$ and ${\bm F_2}$ denote the external forces on the test bodies. The torque about the fibre axis is $T_z=({\bm F_1} \times {\bm F_2}\cdot {\bm r_{12}}) /|{\bm F_1}+{\bm F_2}|$. The signal is the change in $T_z$ when the instrument is rotated about the fibre axis so that the component of $\bm r_{12}$ along the direction of ${\bm F_1}\times{\bm F_2}$ changes sign.
  • Figure 2: Simplified scale drawing of the Eöt-Wash WEP torsion balance.
  • Figure 3: [Colour online] Torsion pendulum used in the recent Eöt-Wash WEP test. An Al frame holds 4 mirrors and supports 8 barrel-shaped test bodies, 4 of which are Be and 4 are Ti or Al. The structure underneath the pendulum allows the pendulum to be parked to prevent damage when the apparatus is serviced and catches the pendulum if a small earthquake should break the suspension fibre. The tungsten fibre is just visible at the top.
  • Figure 4: [Colour online] Power spectral density of the twist signal. The upper [blue] histogram shows WEP data taken with $\omega_{\rm tt}/\omega_0=2/3$. The curve is the thermal noise predicted by equation \ref{['eq: noise']} for a room-temperature oscillator with $Q=6000$. The peaks at integer multiples of $\omega_{\rm tt}$ arise from reproduceable variations in $\omega_{\rm tt}$ (see equation \ref{['eq: false effect']}). The small peak at $\omega_{\rm tt}/2$ is caused by the turntable leveling system that recomputed the tilt every two turntable rotationshe:08. The lower [green] histogram displays data taken with the turntable stationary and the pendulum resting on a support to show the readout noise. The low-frequency readout noise is ascribed to thermal fluctuations.
  • Figure 5: Data collected in the Ti-Be (first 4 runs) and Be-Ti (last 2 runs) configurations of the pendulum. The final result is in the difference between the means of the two configurations (shown as solid lines).
  • ...and 4 more figures