Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Nucleon mass and sigma term from lattice QCD with two light fermion flavors

G. S. Bali, P. C. Bruns, S. Collins, M. Deka, B. Gläßle, M. Göckeler, L. Greil, T. R. Hemmert, R. Horsley, J. Najjar, Y. Nakamura, A. Nobile, D. Pleiter, P. E. L. Rakow, A. Schäfer, R. Schiel, G. Schierholz, A. Sternbeck, J. Zanotti

TL;DR

The paper analyzes two-flavor lattice QCD data for the nucleon mass across pion masses down to 157 MeV and confronts it with covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory up to next-to-next-to-leading order. A novel aspect is the simultaneous fitting of $M_N(m_\pi)$ and the directly computed pion-nucleon sigma-term via the Feynman-Hellmann relation, with finite-volume corrections incorporated and the Sommer scale $r_0$ determined self-consistently. The study finds a physical sigma-term of $\sigma_{\rm phys}=37(8)(6)$ MeV and a Sommer scale $r_0=0.501(10)(11)$ fm, obtained from robust ${O}(p^4)$ fits within the range $m_\pi<435$ MeV. These results indicate reasonable agreement with other $N_f=2$ and $N_f=2+1$ determinations, while highlighting convergence challenges above $m_\pi\sim250$ MeV and the need for additional low-$m_\pi$ data to better constrain higher-order low-energy constants.

Abstract

We analyze Nf=2 nucleon mass data with respect to their dependence on the pion mass down to mpi = 157 MeV and compare it with predictions from covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory (BChPT). A novel feature of our approach is that we fit the nucleon mass data simultaneously with the directly obtained pion-nucleon sigma-term. Our lattice data below mpi = 435 MeV is well described by O(p^4) BChPT and we find sigma=37(8)(6) MeV for the sigma-term at the physical point. Using the nucleon mass to set the scale we obtain a Sommer parameter of r_0=0.501(10)(11) fm.

Nucleon mass and sigma term from lattice QCD with two light fermion flavors

TL;DR

The paper analyzes two-flavor lattice QCD data for the nucleon mass across pion masses down to 157 MeV and confronts it with covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory up to next-to-next-to-leading order. A novel aspect is the simultaneous fitting of and the directly computed pion-nucleon sigma-term via the Feynman-Hellmann relation, with finite-volume corrections incorporated and the Sommer scale determined self-consistently. The study finds a physical sigma-term of MeV and a Sommer scale fm, obtained from robust fits within the range MeV. These results indicate reasonable agreement with other and determinations, while highlighting convergence challenges above MeV and the need for additional low- data to better constrain higher-order low-energy constants.

Abstract

We analyze Nf=2 nucleon mass data with respect to their dependence on the pion mass down to mpi = 157 MeV and compare it with predictions from covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory (BChPT). A novel feature of our approach is that we fit the nucleon mass data simultaneously with the directly obtained pion-nucleon sigma-term. Our lattice data below mpi = 435 MeV is well described by O(p^4) BChPT and we find sigma=37(8)(6) MeV for the sigma-term at the physical point. Using the nucleon mass to set the scale we obtain a Sommer parameter of r_0=0.501(10)(11) fm.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 37 equations, 11 figures, 5 tables.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Lattice data for $r_0M_N$ versus $(r_0m_\pi)^2$ for different lattice spacings ($\beta=5.25$, $5.29$, $5.40$) and volumes. Open (filled) symbols refer to points where $L\le3r_0$ ($L>3r_0$). A black-framed (yellow) circle indicates the physical point assuming $r_0=0.5$ fm. The dotted lines connect points of the same $(\beta,\kappa)$ but different lattice size. They are meant to guide the eye and to illustrate finite-volume effects.
  • Figure 2: Volume dependence of our pion mass data. Left top: $\beta=5.29$, $\kappa=0.13632$. Left bottom: $\beta=5.29$, $\kappa=0.13640$. Right top: $\beta=5.40$, $\kappa=0.13640$. Right bottom: $\beta=5.40$, $\kappa=0.13660$. Dashed-dotted lines represent finite-volume extrapolations, obtained from applying the method of Colangelo:2005gd to the point for the smallest $r_0/L$. Vertical dotted lines denote constant $m_\pi L$. Gray areas mark the region ($m_\pi L<3.5$) where finite-volume corrections are not under control.
  • Figure 3: Fit (surface) to the nucleon mass data (full circles) for a range of $r_0/L$ and $(r_0m_\pi)^2$ values. Black circles lie above the surface, gray (or half gray) below (or on) the surface. The line and the red diamonds at $r_0/L=0$ mark the fitted infinite volume prediction. For the sake of simplicity, for each $(r_0m_\pi)^2$ only one extrapolated (red) point is shown at $r_0/L=0$.
  • Figure 4: Simultaneous fits to the nucleon mass (left) and $\sigma$-term data (right) for three fitting windows with $(r_0m_\pi)_{\max}^2=3.0$, 1.6 and 1.3 (from top to bottom). These fits are labeled Soo3, Soo2 and Soo1 in Table \ref{['tab:fitparaS']}, where $c_2\equiv 3.3\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$, $c_3\equiv -4.7\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-1}$ and $\bar{l}_3\equiv3.2$. Lines, error bands and (full red) points are shown for the limit $L\to\infty$ (cf. Fig. \ref{['fig:3dPlot']}). A black-framed circle marks the location of the physical point using---for each plot separately---the $r_0$-value for which the fit is self-consistent. Open points did not enter any fit. In the left plots, the overlap of red points at $(r_0m_\pi)^2=0.436$ and 0.538 indicates the quality of the (fitted) finite-volume corrections.
  • Figure 5: Left panel: stand-alone fit to the nucleon mass data (see fit Noo2 in Table \ref{['tab:fitparaN']}). Right panel: comparison of the $\sigma$-term data (open symbols) for a $32^3\times 64$ and $40^3\times64$ lattice Bali:2011ks and the BChPT expression for $\sigma(m_\pi)$ with the parameters $M_0$, $c_1$ and $e_r^1$ taken from the nucleon mass fit shown in the left panel. The black-framed circle is the value for $r_0M_N$ ($r_0\sigma_{N}$) at the physical point for these parameters. In both panels, the one-sigma error band is shown in gray. As in Fig. \ref{['fig:Splots']}, the overlap of (red) points (left panel) at same $(r_0m_\pi)^2$ indicates the quality of the (fitted) finite-volume corrections.
  • ...and 6 more figures