Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Higgs self-coupling measurements at the LHC

Matthew J. Dolan, Christoph Englert, Michael Spannowsky

TL;DR

This work analyzes how to measure the Higgs self-coupling $\lambda$ at the LHC for a SM-like Higgs around $m_h=125$ GeV by studying dihiggs production in multiple channels and kinematic regimes. It emphasizes full one-loop calculations for $gg\to hh$ (beyond EFT) and investigates both inclusive $hh$ and $hh+j$ production, employing boosted techniques and jet-substructure to enhance sensitivity, particularly in $h\to b\bar{b}, W^+W^-, \tau^+\tau^-$ final states. The study finds inclusive channels suffer from large backgrounds, while boosted channels—especially $hh\to b\bar{b}\tau^+\tau^-$ and $hhj\to b\bar{b}\tau^+\tau^- j$—offer the most promise, given sufficient luminosity and robust $\tau$ tagging. Overall, a combination of channels and jet-assisted strategies could enable meaningful constraints on $\lambda$ at the LHC, highlighting the importance of high-luminosity data and advanced reconstruction techniques.

Abstract

Both the ATLAS and CMS collaborations have reported a Standard Model Higgs-like excess at around $m_h = 125$ GeV. If an SM-like Higgs particle is discovered in this particular mass range, an important additional test of the SM electroweak symmetry breaking sector is the measurement of the Higgs self-interactions. We investigate the prospects of measuring the Higgs self-coupling for $m_h=125 \gev$ in the dominant SM decay channels in boosted and unboosted kinematical regimes. We further enhance sensitivity by considering dihiggs systems recoiling against a hard jet. This configuration exhibits a large sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling which can be accessed in subjet-based analyses. Combining our analyses allows constraints to be set on the Higgs self-coupling at the LHC.

Higgs self-coupling measurements at the LHC

TL;DR

This work analyzes how to measure the Higgs self-coupling at the LHC for a SM-like Higgs around GeV by studying dihiggs production in multiple channels and kinematic regimes. It emphasizes full one-loop calculations for (beyond EFT) and investigates both inclusive and production, employing boosted techniques and jet-substructure to enhance sensitivity, particularly in final states. The study finds inclusive channels suffer from large backgrounds, while boosted channels—especially and —offer the most promise, given sufficient luminosity and robust tagging. Overall, a combination of channels and jet-assisted strategies could enable meaningful constraints on at the LHC, highlighting the importance of high-luminosity data and advanced reconstruction techniques.

Abstract

Both the ATLAS and CMS collaborations have reported a Standard Model Higgs-like excess at around GeV. If an SM-like Higgs particle is discovered in this particular mass range, an important additional test of the SM electroweak symmetry breaking sector is the measurement of the Higgs self-interactions. We investigate the prospects of measuring the Higgs self-coupling for in the dominant SM decay channels in boosted and unboosted kinematical regimes. We further enhance sensitivity by considering dihiggs systems recoiling against a hard jet. This configuration exhibits a large sensitivity to the Higgs self-coupling which can be accessed in subjet-based analyses. Combining our analyses allows constraints to be set on the Higgs self-coupling at the LHC.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 4 equations, 8 figures, 5 tables.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Sample Feynman graphs contributing to $pp\to hh+X$. Graphs of type (a) yield vanishing contributions due to color conservation.
  • Figure 2: Comparison of the (normalized) $p_{T,h}$ distributions in $pp\to hh+X$ at LO for different multiples of the trilinear Higgs coupling $\lambda$ ($m_t=172.5~{\rm{GeV}}$ and $m_b=4.5~{\rm{GeV}}$ using CTEQ6l1 parton densities).
  • Figure 3: Comparison of $pp\to hh+X$ at LO. We choose $m_t=175~{\rm{GeV}}$ as in Ref. Plehn:1996wb, from which we also obtain the dashed blue reference line, and $m_b=4.5~{\rm{GeV}}$ and we use the CTEQ6l1 parton distributions.
  • Figure 4: Sample Feynman graphs contributing to $pp \to hh+j+X$. Not shown are the $qg,\bar{q} g$ and $q\bar{q}$ subprocesses.
  • Figure 5: Comparison of the leading order $p_{T,j}$ spectrum for $pp\to hh+j+X$ production. Shown are distributions for the effective interaction (obtained with MadGraph v5 Alwall:2011uj via FeynRulesChristensen:2008py and UfoDegrande:2011ua), and the full one-loop matrix element calculation. We again choose $m_t=172.5~{\rm{GeV}}$ and $m_b=4.5~{\rm{GeV}}$ using CTEQ6l1 parton densities and $\mu_F=\mu_R=p_{T,j}+2m_h$.
  • ...and 3 more figures