A new, precise measurement of the primordial abundance of Deuterium
Max Pettini, Ryan Cooke
TL;DR
This study presents a precise measurement of the primordial deuterium abundance using a metal-poor damped Lyman alpha system at $z=3.04984$, analyzed with a dedicated spectral-fitting pipeline that simultaneously models H I, D I, and metal lines while rigorously characterizing random and systematic errors. The result, $\log({\rm D I/H I}) = -4.596 \pm 0.009$, corresponds to $(D/H)_{\rm p} = (2.535 \pm 0.05)\times10^{-5}$ and implies $100\Omega_{\rm b,0}h^2({\rm BBN}) = 2.23\pm0.09$, in excellent agreement with the CMB value $100\Omega_{\rm b,0}h^2({\rm CMB}) = 2.22\pm0.042$. This concordance suggests no need for non-standard physics to reconcile BBN with the CMB, emphasizing the importance of homogeneous, self-consistent analyses of D/H_p measurements across DLAs. The work also highlights the heterogeneity of previous D/H_p data and advocates assembling a uniform dataset to improve constraints on BBN nuclear reactions and subsequent light-element processing. Planck-era CMB data are expected to further tighten the cosmic baryon density, while continued D/H_p measurements will remain crucial for understanding primordial nucleosynthesis and early-Universe physics.
Abstract
The metal-poor damped Lyman alpha (DLA) system at z = 3.04984 in the QSO SDSSJ1419+0829 has near-ideal properties for an accurate determination of the primordial abundance of deuterium, (D/H)_p. We have analysed a high-quality spectrum of this object with software specifically designed to deduce the best fitting value of D/H and to assess comprehensively the random and systematic errors affecting this determination. We find (D/H)_DLA = (2.535 +/-0.05) x 10^(-5), which in turn implies Omega_b h^2 = 0.0223 +/- 0.0009, in very good agreement with Omega_b h^2 (CMB) = 0.0222 +/- 0.0004 deduced from the angular power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background. If the value in this DLA is indeed the true (D/H)_p produced by Big-Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), there may be no need to invoke non-standard physics nor early astration of D to bring together Omega_b h^2 (BBN) and Omega_b h^2 (CMB). The scatter between most of the reported values of (D/H)_p in the literature may be due largely to unaccounted systematic errors and biases. Further progress in this area will require a homogeneous set of data comparable to those reported here and analysed in a self-consistent manner. Such an endeavour, while observationally demanding, has the potential of improving our understanding of BBN physics, including the relevant nuclear reactions, and the subsequent processing of 4He and 7Li through stars.
