Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment

Soo-Bong Kim

TL;DR

The RENO experiment has observed the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos, consistent with neutrino oscillations, with a significance of 4.9 standard deviations.

Abstract

The RENO experiment has observed the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos, consistent with neutrino oscillations, with a significance of 4.9 standard deviations. Antineutrinos from six 2.8 GW$_{th}$ reactors at the Yonggwang Nuclear Power Plant in Korea, are detected by two identical detectors located at 294 m and 1383 m, respectively, from the reactor array center. In the 229 day data-taking period between 11 August 2011 and 26 March 2012, the far (near) detector observed 17102 (154088) electron antineutrino candidate events with a background fraction of 5.5% (2.7%). The ratio of observed to expected numbers of antineutrinos in the far detector is $0.920 \pm 0.009({\rm stat.}) \pm 0.014({\rm syst.})$. From this deficit, we determine $\sin^2 2 θ_{13} = 0.113 \pm 0.013({\rm stat.}) \pm 0.019({\rm syst.})$ based on a rate-only analysis.

Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment

TL;DR

The RENO experiment has observed the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos, consistent with neutrino oscillations, with a significance of 4.9 standard deviations.

Abstract

The RENO experiment has observed the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos, consistent with neutrino oscillations, with a significance of 4.9 standard deviations. Antineutrinos from six 2.8 GW reactors at the Yonggwang Nuclear Power Plant in Korea, are detected by two identical detectors located at 294 m and 1383 m, respectively, from the reactor array center. In the 229 day data-taking period between 11 August 2011 and 26 March 2012, the far (near) detector observed 17102 (154088) electron antineutrino candidate events with a background fraction of 5.5% (2.7%). The ratio of observed to expected numbers of antineutrinos in the far detector is . From this deficit, we determine based on a rate-only analysis.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 equations, 4 figures, 2 tables.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: A schematic view of a RENO detector. The near and far detectors are identical.
  • Figure 2: Measured daily-average rates of reactor neutrinos after background subtraction in the near and far detectors as a function of running time. The solid curves are the predicted rates for no oscillation.
  • Figure 3: The $\chi^2$ distribution as a function of $\sin^2 2\theta_{13}$. Bottom: Ratio of the measured reactor neutrino events relative to the expected with no oscillation. The curve represents the oscillation survival probability at the best fit, as a function of the flux-weighted baselines.
  • Figure 4: Observed spectrum of the prompt signals in the far detector compared with the non-oscillation predictions from the measurements in the near detector. The backgrounds shown in the inset are subtracted for the far spectrum. The background fraction is 5.5% (2.7%) for far (near) detector. Errors are statistical uncertainties only. Bottom: The ratio of the measured spectrum of far detector to the non-oscillation prediction.