Single and Double Perturbative Splitting Diagrams in Double Parton Scattering
Jonathan R. Gaunt, W. James Stirling
TL;DR
The paper scrutinizes how perturbative parton splitting diagrams contribute to double parton scattering (DPS) cross sections, focusing on single (2v1) and double (1v1) perturbative splitting graphs. It demonstrates that the established dPDF (2pGPD) framework struggles to cleanly separate a genuine DPS piece for 1v1 diagrams, often requiring arbitrary scales and yielding questionable interpretations, and shows that 2v1 graphs introduce LO logarithmic terms with distinct transverse structure. By deriving explicit expressions for 1v2 and analyzing their relation to 2v2, the authors propose including 2v1 contributions alongside 2v2 while cautioning that simple σ_eff rescalings are unreliable and that a consistent framework must account for different b-dependences and nonperturbative input. Overall, the work highlights significant conceptual and technical challenges in formulating a robust, double-counting-free DPS theory that accurately incorporates perturbative splittings and their interplay with nonperturbative correlations. This has important implications for precise DPS background predictions and for understanding parton-parton correlations inside the proton.
Abstract
We discuss the role of two different types of diagram in the proton-proton double parton scattering (DPS) cross section - single and double perturbative splitting graphs. Using explicit calculations of simple graphs from these classes we show that the treatment of these graphs by the 'double PDF' framework for describing the DPS cross section, introduced a number of years ago by Snigirev and collaborators, is unsatisfactory. We suggest that a contribution from single perturbative splitting graphs should be included in the DPS cross section, albeit with a different geometrical prefactor to the contribution from 'zero perturbative splitting' graphs.
