Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Spread Supersymmetry

Lawrence J. Hall, Yasunori Nomura

TL;DR

Spread Supersymmetry addresses how a scanning SUSY-breaking scale $\tilde{m}$ can be compatible with environmental bounds on dark matter by introducing a large forbidden window between ${\rm TeV}$ and $T_R$; this yields two main classes of spectra, including TeV-scale LOSP/ LSP in Spread SUSY and the Environmental MSSM. The authors analyze two realizations with a Higgsino LSP and a Wino LSP, showing preserved gauge coupling unification, a SM-like Higgs in the 100--145 GeV range, and distinctive dark matter and collider signatures such as monochromatic photons, direct detection cross sections around $10^{-47}$ cm$^2$, and disappearing charged tracks. The framework links the DM composition to the LSP mass via multiverse priors and loop-suppressed mass generation, providing testable predictions for gamma-ray lines, direct and indirect DM searches, and future linear colliders while keeping the colored sector out of reach at the LHC. Overall, the work offers a plausible multiverse-based route to TeV-scale new physics with clear experimental handles that distinguish it from naturalness-based SUSY scenarios.

Abstract

In the multiverse the scale of SUSY breaking, \tilde{m} = F_X/M_*, may scan and environmental constraints on the dark matter density may exclude a large range of \tilde{m} from the reheating temperature after inflation down to values that yield a LSP mass of order a TeV. After selection effects, the distribution for \tilde{m} may prefer larger values. A single environmental constraint from dark matter can then lead to multi-component dark matter, including both axions and the LSP, giving a TeV-scale LSP lighter than the corresponding value for single-component LSP dark matter. If SUSY breaking is mediated to the SM sector at order X^* X, only squarks, sleptons and one Higgs doublet acquire masses of order \tilde{m}. The gravitino mass is lighter by a factor of M_*/M_Pl and the gaugino masses are suppressed by a further loop factor. This Spread SUSY spectrum has two versions; the Higgsino masses are generated in one from supergravity giving a wino LSP and in the other radiatively giving a Higgsino LSP. The environmental restriction on dark matter fixes the LSP mass to the TeV domain, so that the squark and slepton masses are order 10^3 TeV and 10^6 TeV in these two schemes. We study the spectrum, dark matter and collider signals of these two versions of Spread SUSY. The Higgs is SM-like and lighter than 145 GeV; monochromatic photons in cosmic rays arise from dark matter annihilations in the halo; exotic short charged tracks occur at the LHC, at least for the wino LSP; and there are the eventual possibilities of direct detection of dark matter and detailed exploration of the TeV-scale states at a future linear collider. Gauge coupling unification is as in minimal SUSY theories. If SUSY breaking is mediated at order X, a much less hierarchical spectrum results---similar to that of the MSSM, but with the superpartner masses 1--2 orders of magnitude larger than in natural theories.

Spread Supersymmetry

TL;DR

Spread Supersymmetry addresses how a scanning SUSY-breaking scale can be compatible with environmental bounds on dark matter by introducing a large forbidden window between and ; this yields two main classes of spectra, including TeV-scale LOSP/ LSP in Spread SUSY and the Environmental MSSM. The authors analyze two realizations with a Higgsino LSP and a Wino LSP, showing preserved gauge coupling unification, a SM-like Higgs in the 100--145 GeV range, and distinctive dark matter and collider signatures such as monochromatic photons, direct detection cross sections around cm, and disappearing charged tracks. The framework links the DM composition to the LSP mass via multiverse priors and loop-suppressed mass generation, providing testable predictions for gamma-ray lines, direct and indirect DM searches, and future linear colliders while keeping the colored sector out of reach at the LHC. Overall, the work offers a plausible multiverse-based route to TeV-scale new physics with clear experimental handles that distinguish it from naturalness-based SUSY scenarios.

Abstract

In the multiverse the scale of SUSY breaking, \tilde{m} = F_X/M_*, may scan and environmental constraints on the dark matter density may exclude a large range of \tilde{m} from the reheating temperature after inflation down to values that yield a LSP mass of order a TeV. After selection effects, the distribution for \tilde{m} may prefer larger values. A single environmental constraint from dark matter can then lead to multi-component dark matter, including both axions and the LSP, giving a TeV-scale LSP lighter than the corresponding value for single-component LSP dark matter. If SUSY breaking is mediated to the SM sector at order X^* X, only squarks, sleptons and one Higgs doublet acquire masses of order \tilde{m}. The gravitino mass is lighter by a factor of M_*/M_Pl and the gaugino masses are suppressed by a further loop factor. This Spread SUSY spectrum has two versions; the Higgsino masses are generated in one from supergravity giving a wino LSP and in the other radiatively giving a Higgsino LSP. The environmental restriction on dark matter fixes the LSP mass to the TeV domain, so that the squark and slepton masses are order 10^3 TeV and 10^6 TeV in these two schemes. We study the spectrum, dark matter and collider signals of these two versions of Spread SUSY. The Higgs is SM-like and lighter than 145 GeV; monochromatic photons in cosmic rays arise from dark matter annihilations in the halo; exotic short charged tracks occur at the LHC, at least for the wino LSP; and there are the eventual possibilities of direct detection of dark matter and detailed exploration of the TeV-scale states at a future linear collider. Gauge coupling unification is as in minimal SUSY theories. If SUSY breaking is mediated at order X, a much less hierarchical spectrum results---similar to that of the MSSM, but with the superpartner masses 1--2 orders of magnitude larger than in natural theories.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 20 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Two versions of the Spread Supersymmetry spectrum, with the Higgsino LSP (left) and the wino LSP (right).
  • Figure 2: A large window between $\sim {\rm TeV}$ and $\approx T_R$ for the LOSP mass, $m_{\rm LOSP}$, is forbidden since it overproduces dark matter, beyond the bound in Eq. (\ref{['eq:xi-bound']}).
  • Figure 3: The masses of superpartners as a function of $\tilde{m}$, both on logarithmic scales, for the case where supersymmetry breaking is transmitted to the superpartners at order $X^\dagger X$ (left) and at order $X$ (right). The forbidden window of Section \ref{['sec:forb-window']} is indicated by the shaded areas.
  • Figure 4: The Higgs mass prediction in Spread Supersymmetry with Higgsino LSP as a function of $\sin 2\beta$. (The corresponding values of $\tan\beta$ are also indicated at the top.) The solid red curve gives the Higgs mass prediction for $m_t = 173.2~{\rm GeV}$, while the dark-shaded band shows the uncertainty coming from the experimental error of $\delta m_t = \pm 0.9~{\rm GeV}$. The uncertainty from the superpartner mass scale $\tilde{m}$ is depicted by the light-shaded band, which corresponds to $10^7~{\rm GeV} < \tilde{m} < 10^9~{\rm GeV}$.
  • Figure 5: Evolution of the three gauge couplings, $g_{1,2,3}$ (solid, blue) and the top Yukawa coupling (dashed, red) for $\tan\beta = 1$ in Spread Supersymmetry with Higgsino LSP. The hypercharge gauge coupling has $SU(5)$ normalization.