On MHV Form Factors in Superspace for $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM Theory
L. V. Bork, D. I. Kazakov, G. S. Vartanov
TL;DR
This paper develops a manifestly N=4 supersymmetric unitarity framework for form factors of operators in the chiral truncation of the stress-tensor multiplet, introducing the concept of a superstate–super form factor and establishing a link between zero-supermomentum form factors and the logarithmic derivative of the superamplitude with respect to the coupling. It provides explicit tree- and one-loop MHV results for n-point form factors, including a complete tree-level MHV form factor and its SUSY covariant expression, and demonstrates correctness of the soft limit relation to amplitudes. A reduction procedure for dual pseudoconformal scalar integrals is proposed to generate the basis of scalar integrals for form factors, enabling a two-loop three-point MHV ansatz built from a reduced integral basis. The work lays groundwork for higher-loop, higher-point analyses and enhances understanding of the interplay between operator insertions, form factors, and amplitudes in N=4 SYM, with potential implications for amplitude–Wilson loop dualities and correlation-function structures.
Abstract
In this paper we develop a supersymmetric version of unitarity cut method for form factors of operators from the chiral truncation of the the $\mathcal{N}=4$ stress-tensor current supermultiplet $T^{AB}$. The relation between the superform factor with supermomentum equals to zero and the logarithmic derivative of the superamplitude with respect to the coupling constant is discussed and verified at tree- and one-loop level for any MHV $n$-point ($n \geq 4$) superform factor involving operators from chiral truncation of the stress-tensor energy supermultiplet. The explicit $\mathcal{N}=4$ covariant expressions for n-point tree- and one-loop MHV form factors are obtained. As well, the ansatz for the two-loop three-point MHV superform factor is suggested in the planar limit, based on the reduction procedure for the scalar integrals suggested in our previous work. The different soft and collinear limits in the MHV sector at tree- and one-loop level are discussed.
