Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Symmetries of K3 sigma models

Matthias R. Gaberdiel, Stefan Hohenegger, Roberto Volpato

TL;DR

This work classifies the supersymmetry-preserving automorphisms of K3 ${\rm N}=(4,4)$ sigma-models and proves they sit inside the Conway group ${\rm Co}_1$, extending Mukai–Kondo from geometry to string theory. It develops a lattice-based argument via embeddings into the Leech lattice and analyzes three concrete CFT realizations—the ${\mathbb T}^4/\mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifold and the Gepner points $(2)^4$ and $(1)^6$—to show the actual symmetry groups can lie outside ${\rm M}_{24}$ while remaining within ${\rm Co}_1$. The paper also details the D-brane charge lattices in these models and computes twining genera, revealing both ${\rm M}_{24}$-consistent and non-Mathieu genera, thereby refining how moonshine phenomena arise in K3 compactifications. Overall, the results provide a concrete stringy counterpart to Mukai’s theorem and illuminate how moduli-space symmetries manifest in physical theories of K3. The findings have implications for understanding symmetry structures in string compactifications and their connections to sporadic groups and moonshine-like phenomena.

Abstract

It is shown that the supersymmetry-preserving automorphisms of any non-linear sigma-model on K3 generate a subgroup of the Conway group Co_1. This is the stringy generalisation of the classical theorem, due to Mukai and Kondo, showing that the symplectic automorphisms of any K3 manifold form a subgroup of the Mathieu group M_{23}. The Conway group Co_1 contains the Mathieu group M_{24} (and therefore in particular M_{23}) as a subgroup. We confirm the predictions of the Theorem with three explicit CFT realisations of K3: the T^4/Z_2 orbifold at the self-dual point, and the two Gepner models (2)^4 and (1)^6. In each case we demonstrate that their symmetries do not form a subgroup of M_{24}, but lie inside Co_1 as predicted by our Theorem.

Symmetries of K3 sigma models

TL;DR

This work classifies the supersymmetry-preserving automorphisms of K3 sigma-models and proves they sit inside the Conway group , extending Mukai–Kondo from geometry to string theory. It develops a lattice-based argument via embeddings into the Leech lattice and analyzes three concrete CFT realizations—the orbifold and the Gepner points and —to show the actual symmetry groups can lie outside while remaining within . The paper also details the D-brane charge lattices in these models and computes twining genera, revealing both -consistent and non-Mathieu genera, thereby refining how moonshine phenomena arise in K3 compactifications. Overall, the results provide a concrete stringy counterpart to Mukai’s theorem and illuminate how moduli-space symmetries manifest in physical theories of K3. The findings have implications for understanding symmetry structures in string compactifications and their connections to sporadic groups and moonshine-like phenomena.

Abstract

It is shown that the supersymmetry-preserving automorphisms of any non-linear sigma-model on K3 generate a subgroup of the Conway group Co_1. This is the stringy generalisation of the classical theorem, due to Mukai and Kondo, showing that the symplectic automorphisms of any K3 manifold form a subgroup of the Mathieu group M_{23}. The Conway group Co_1 contains the Mathieu group M_{24} (and therefore in particular M_{23}) as a subgroup. We confirm the predictions of the Theorem with three explicit CFT realisations of K3: the T^4/Z_2 orbifold at the self-dual point, and the two Gepner models (2)^4 and (1)^6. In each case we demonstrate that their symmetries do not form a subgroup of M_{24}, but lie inside Co_1 as predicted by our Theorem.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 32 sections, 3 theorems, 102 equations, 2 tables.

Key Result

Proposition 1

For any choice of a positive 4-plane $\Pi$, $L_G$ is a negative definite lattice of rank $\mathop{\mathrm{rk}}\nolimits L_G\le 20$. $G$ acts trivially on $A_{L_G}$, and $l(L_G)\le 24-\mathop{\mathrm{rk}}\nolimits(L_G)$.

Theorems & Definitions (5)

  • Proposition 1
  • proof
  • Proposition 2
  • proof
  • Proposition 3