Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Disentangling non-Gaussianity, bias and GR effects in the galaxy distribution

Marco Bruni, Robert Crittenden, Kazuya Koyama, Roy Maartens, Cyril Pitrou, David Wands

TL;DR

This paper addresses disentangling local-type primordial non-Gaussianity from General Relativistic (GR) corrections and bias definitions in the galaxy distribution on large scales. It presents a GR-consistent framework for predicting observable angular power spectra $C_\ell(z)$, emphasizing that bias must be defined in the comoving-synchronous gauge and that naive Newtonian definitions can fake an $f_{ m NL}$ signal via a $k^{-2}$ bias term. The authors show that full GR corrections can produce large-scale signatures of order $f_{ m NL}=O(1)$ but with distinct redshift and scale dependence, enabling discrimination when analyzing $C_\ell(z)$. They conclude that deep, wide surveys and cross-tracer strategies are essential to overcome cosmic variance and robustly constrain primordial non-Gaussianity.

Abstract

Local non-Gaussianity, parametrized by $f_{\rm NL}$, introduces a scale-dependent bias that is strongest at large scales, precisely where General Relativistic (GR) effects also become significant. With future data, it should be possible to constrain $f_{\rm NL} = {\cal O}(1)$ with high redshift surveys. GR corrections to the power spectrum and ambiguities in the gauge used to define bias introduce effects similar to $f_{\rm NL}= {\cal O}(1)$, so it is essential to disentangle these effects. For the first time in studies of primordial non-Gaussianity, we include the consistent GR calculation of galaxy power spectra, highlighting the importance of a proper definition of bias. We present observable power spectra with and without GR corrections, showing that an incorrect definition of bias can mimic non-Gaussianity. However, these effects can be distinguished by their different redshift and scale dependence, so as to extract the true primordial non-Gaussianity.

Disentangling non-Gaussianity, bias and GR effects in the galaxy distribution

TL;DR

This paper addresses disentangling local-type primordial non-Gaussianity from General Relativistic (GR) corrections and bias definitions in the galaxy distribution on large scales. It presents a GR-consistent framework for predicting observable angular power spectra , emphasizing that bias must be defined in the comoving-synchronous gauge and that naive Newtonian definitions can fake an signal via a bias term. The authors show that full GR corrections can produce large-scale signatures of order but with distinct redshift and scale dependence, enabling discrimination when analyzing . They conclude that deep, wide surveys and cross-tracer strategies are essential to overcome cosmic variance and robustly constrain primordial non-Gaussianity.

Abstract

Local non-Gaussianity, parametrized by , introduces a scale-dependent bias that is strongest at large scales, precisely where General Relativistic (GR) effects also become significant. With future data, it should be possible to constrain with high redshift surveys. GR corrections to the power spectrum and ambiguities in the gauge used to define bias introduce effects similar to , so it is essential to disentangle these effects. For the first time in studies of primordial non-Gaussianity, we include the consistent GR calculation of galaxy power spectra, highlighting the importance of a proper definition of bias. We present observable power spectra with and without GR corrections, showing that an incorrect definition of bias can mimic non-Gaussianity. However, these effects can be distinguished by their different redshift and scale dependence, so as to extract the true primordial non-Gaussianity.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 17 equations, 2 figures.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Left: The power spectrum of various density perturbations at $z=1$. We use a standard LCDM background and assume $\bar{b}=2$. Right: The angular power spectrum at $z=1$ assuming all galaxies are in a Gaussian window function of width $\sigma_z=0.1$. See text for detailed explanation. Note that we take $f_{\rm NL}=0.63$, which is slightly different from $f_{\rm NL}=3/A$ due to the effect of the cosmological constant. Also $A$ evolves with redshift and a different $f_{\rm NL}$ would be required at another redshift.
  • Figure 2: Ratio of the standard angular power spectra to the full GR spectrum in various cases. See text for detailed explanation. We assume $\bar{b}=2$ and all the galaxies are in a Gaussian window function of width $\sigma_z=0.1 z$.