Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Determination of αS using OPAL hadronic event shapes at sqrt(s) = 91 - 209 GeV and resummed NNLO calculations

The OPAL Collaboration

TL;DR

This study determines the strong coupling constant $\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}$ from hadronic event-shape distributions in $e^+e^-$ annihilation using OPAL data from $\sqrt{s}=91$–$209$ GeV. It employs state-of-the-art QCD predictions at NNLO and NNLO+NLLA, performing fits to six observables and combining results across 13 energy points to extract $\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}(m_{Z^0})$. The NNLO result yields $\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}(m_{Z^0}) = 0.1201(0.0031)$ and the NNLO+NLLA result yields $\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}(m_{Z^0}) = 0.1189(0.0041)$, with the energy dependence consistent with QCD running and asymptotic freedom. These measurements exemplify the improved theoretical control and precision achievable with higher-order perturbative calculations and align with the current world average.

Abstract

Hadronic event shape distributions from e+e- annihilation measured by the OPAL experiment at centre-of-mass energies between 91 GeV and 209 GeV are used to determine the strong coupling αS. The results are based on QCD predictions complete to the next-to- next-to-leading order (NNLO), and on NNLO calculations matched to the resummed next-to-leading-log-approximation terms (NNLO+NLLA). The combined NNLO result from all variables and centre-of-mass energies is αS(mZ0) = 0.1201 {\pm} 0.0008(stat.) {\pm} 0.0013(exp.) {\pm} 0.0010(had.) {\pm} 0.0024(theo.). while the combined NNLO+NLLA result is αS(mZ0) = 0.1189 {\pm} 0.0008(stat.) {\pm} 0.0016(exp.) {\pm} 0.0010(had.) {\pm} 0.0036(theo.). The completeness of the NNLO and NNLO+NLLA results with respect to missing higher order contributions, studied by varying the renormalization scale, is improved compared to previous results based on NLO or NLO+NLLA predictions only. The observed energy dependence of αS agrees with the QCD prediction of asymptotic freedom and excludes the absence of running.

Determination of αS using OPAL hadronic event shapes at sqrt(s) = 91 - 209 GeV and resummed NNLO calculations

TL;DR

This study determines the strong coupling constant from hadronic event-shape distributions in annihilation using OPAL data from GeV. It employs state-of-the-art QCD predictions at NNLO and NNLO+NLLA, performing fits to six observables and combining results across 13 energy points to extract . The NNLO result yields and the NNLO+NLLA result yields , with the energy dependence consistent with QCD running and asymptotic freedom. These measurements exemplify the improved theoretical control and precision achievable with higher-order perturbative calculations and align with the current world average.

Abstract

Hadronic event shape distributions from e+e- annihilation measured by the OPAL experiment at centre-of-mass energies between 91 GeV and 209 GeV are used to determine the strong coupling αS. The results are based on QCD predictions complete to the next-to- next-to-leading order (NNLO), and on NNLO calculations matched to the resummed next-to-leading-log-approximation terms (NNLO+NLLA). The combined NNLO result from all variables and centre-of-mass energies is αS(mZ0) = 0.1201 {\pm} 0.0008(stat.) {\pm} 0.0013(exp.) {\pm} 0.0010(had.) {\pm} 0.0024(theo.). while the combined NNLO+NLLA result is αS(mZ0) = 0.1189 {\pm} 0.0008(stat.) {\pm} 0.0016(exp.) {\pm} 0.0010(had.) {\pm} 0.0036(theo.). The completeness of the NNLO and NNLO+NLLA results with respect to missing higher order contributions, studied by varying the renormalization scale, is improved compared to previous results based on NLO or NLO+NLLA predictions only. The observed energy dependence of αS agrees with the QCD prediction of asymptotic freedom and excludes the absence of running.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 18 sections, 9 equations, 7 figures, 15 tables.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Comparison of NNLO+NLLA calculations for the $1-T$, $M_{\mathrm{H}}$, $B_{\mathrm{T}}$, $B_{\mathrm{W}}$, $C$ and $y_{23}^\mathrm{D}$ variables with the parton level predictions of the Monte Carlo generators PYTHIA 6.1, HERWIG 6.2 and ARIADNE 4.11 at $\sqrt{s}$=91 GeV (see Sect. \ref{['MeasurementsAs']}). The vertically symmetrical band between solid lines shows the maximum deviation of the ratio from one, between the three generators MC$_i$ in the positive and the negative direction. The arrows indicate the respective fit ranges.
  • Figure 2: The points show the $1-T$ and $M_{\mathrm{H}}$ distributions at the hadron level for $\sqrt{s}=91.3$ and 206.6 GeV with statistical uncertainty bars. Some uncertainty bars are smaller than the data points. Superimposed as histograms are the NNLO and NNLO+NLLA predictions combined with hadronisation effects using the corresponding fit results for $\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}(\sqrt{s})$ shown in Tabs. \ref{['asresultsnnlo']}, \ref{['asresultsnnlonlla']}. The arrows indicate the fit ranges.
  • Figure 3: The points show the $B_{\mathrm{T}}$ and $B_{\mathrm{W}}$ distributions at the hadron level for $\sqrt{s}=91.3$ and 206.6 GeV with statistical uncertainty bars. Some uncertainty bars are smaller than the data points. Superimposed as histograms are the NNLO and NNLO+NLLA predictions combined with hadronisation effects using the corresponding fit results for $\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}(\sqrt{s})$ shown in Tabs. \ref{['asresultsnnlo']}, \ref{['asresultsnnlonlla']}. The arrows indicate the fit ranges.
  • Figure 4: The points show the $C$ and $y_{23}^\mathrm{D}$ distributions at the hadron level for $\sqrt{s}=91.3$ and 206.6 GeV with statistical uncertainty bars. Some uncertainty bars are smaller than the data points. Superimposed as histograms are the NNLO and NNLO+NLLA predictions combined with hadronisation effects using the corresponding fit results for $\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}(\sqrt{s})$ shown in Tabs. \ref{['asresultsnnlo']}, \ref{['asresultsnnlonlla']}. The arrows indicate the fit ranges.
  • Figure 5: The points show the values of $\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}$ for the OPAL energy ranges. The inner uncertainty bars show the combined statistical and experimental uncertainties and the outer the total uncertainties. The full and dashed lines indicate the $\alpha_{\mathrm{S}}$ result from the NNLO+NLLA analysis that combines all variables and OPAL energy points. The results from the NNLO+NLLA analysis of JADE data jadeNNLO are shown as well.
  • ...and 2 more figures