Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Realization of Center Symmetry in Two Adjoint Flavor Large-N Yang-Mills

Simon Catterall, Richard Galvez, Mithat Unsal

TL;DR

This work examines center symmetry and large-$N$ volume independence (Eguchi-Kawai reduction) for $SU(N)$ gauge theories with two adjoint Wilson fermions on a $2^4$ lattice. A weak-coupling one-loop analysis shows that for massless fermions the center-symmetric phase is independent of the volume reduction parameter $\Gamma$, and simulations extend the check to finite coupling and nonzero mass. Numerically, the quenched theory exhibits a transition at $\lambda_c \approx 3.0$ between broken and unbroken center symmetry in the large-$N$ limit, while dynamical adjoint fermions suppress the Polyakov loop and restore center symmetry at large $N$ over a range of masses near the critical line. These results support using small-volume, large-$N$ simulations to access infinite-volume observables and to inform the conformal window for adjoint theories, including implications for the minimal walking theory.

Abstract

We report on the results of numerical simulations of $SU(N)$ lattice Yang Mills with two flavors of (light) Wilson fermion in the adjoint representation. We analytically and numerically address the question of center symmetry realization on lattices with $Γ$ sites in each direction in the large-$N$ limit. We show, by a weak coupling calculation that, for massless fermions, center symmetry realization is independent of $Γ$, and is unbroken. Then, we extend our result by conducting simulations at non zero mass and finite gauge coupling. Our results indicate that center symmetry is intact for a range of fermion mass in the vicinity of the critical line on lattices of volume $2^4$. This observation makes it possible to compute infinite volume physical observables using small volume simulations in the limit $N\to\infty$, with possible applications to the determination of the conformal window in gauge theories with adjoint fermions.

Realization of Center Symmetry in Two Adjoint Flavor Large-N Yang-Mills

TL;DR

This work examines center symmetry and large- volume independence (Eguchi-Kawai reduction) for gauge theories with two adjoint Wilson fermions on a lattice. A weak-coupling one-loop analysis shows that for massless fermions the center-symmetric phase is independent of the volume reduction parameter , and simulations extend the check to finite coupling and nonzero mass. Numerically, the quenched theory exhibits a transition at between broken and unbroken center symmetry in the large- limit, while dynamical adjoint fermions suppress the Polyakov loop and restore center symmetry at large over a range of masses near the critical line. These results support using small-volume, large- simulations to access infinite-volume observables and to inform the conformal window for adjoint theories, including implications for the minimal walking theory.

Abstract

We report on the results of numerical simulations of lattice Yang Mills with two flavors of (light) Wilson fermion in the adjoint representation. We analytically and numerically address the question of center symmetry realization on lattices with sites in each direction in the large- limit. We show, by a weak coupling calculation that, for massless fermions, center symmetry realization is independent of , and is unbroken. Then, we extend our result by conducting simulations at non zero mass and finite gauge coupling. Our results indicate that center symmetry is intact for a range of fermion mass in the vicinity of the critical line on lattices of volume . This observation makes it possible to compute infinite volume physical observables using small volume simulations in the limit , with possible applications to the determination of the conformal window in gauge theories with adjoint fermions.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 12 equations, 9 figures.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Simple Polyakov line in the quenched theory vs 't Hooft coupling $\lambda$
  • Figure 2: Plaquette action in the quenched theory vs 't Hooft coupling
  • Figure 3: Polyakov line vs bare quark mass for 't Hooft coupling $\lambda=0.5$
  • Figure 4: Pion mass vs bare quark mass for 't Hooft coupling $\lambda=0.5$
  • Figure 5: Polyakov line vs $1/N$ for $\lambda=0.5$ and $m=-1$
  • ...and 4 more figures