First-year Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II (SDSS-II) Supernova Results: Hubble Diagram and Cosmological Parameters
Richard Kessler, Andrew Becker, David Cinabro, Jake Vanderplas, Joshua A. Frieman, John Marriner, Tamara M Davis, Benjamin Dilday, Jon Holtzman, Saurabh Jha, Hubert Lampeitl, Masao Sako, Mathew Smith, Chen Zheng, Robert C. Nichol, Bruce Bassett, Ralf Bender, Darren L. Depoy, Mamoru Doi, Ed Elson, Alex V. Filippenko, Ryan J. Foley, Peter M. Garnavich, Ulrich Hopp, Yutaka Ihara, William Ketzeback, W. Kollatschny, Kohki Konishi, Jennifer L. Marshall, Russet J. McMillan, Gajus Miknaitis, Tomoki Morokuma, Edvard M"ortsell, Kaike Pan, Jose Luis Prieto, Michael W. Richmond, Adam G. Riess, Roger Romani, Donald P. Schneider, Jesper Sollerman, Naohiro Takanashi, Kouichi Tokita, Kurt van der Heyden, J. C. Wheeler, Naoki Yasuda, Donald York
TL;DR
This paper presents a first-year SDSS-II Type Ia supernova Hubble diagram comprising 103 SNe in the redshift range 0.04 < z < 0.42, aimed at filling the intermediate redshift gap and enabling robust cosmological inferences when combined with BAO and CMB data. It employs two independent light-curve fitters, mlcs2k2 and SALT-II, to derive distances and explores extensive Monte Carlo simulations to model selection effects and systematic uncertainties. The joint SN+BAO+CMB analysis yields constraints on the dark-energy equation of state parameter w and matter density Ω_M in flat and non-flat cosmologies, with w ≈ -0.76 ± 0.07(stat) ± 0.11(syst) for mlcs2k2 and w ≈ -0.96 ± 0.06(stat) ± 0.12(syst) for SALT-II when all SN datasets are included; discrepancies between the methods are traced to differences in rest-frame UV modeling and color variation implementations, with the rest-frame U-band presenting the dominant systematic. The study emphasizes the U-band anomaly as the major limiting systematic and demonstrates that dust properties (R_V and A_V) and underlying distributions are essential priors for distance estimation, while the SDSS-II dust sample provides a robust basis for these inferences. The work highlights the potential of the full three-season SDSS-II data to further tighten constraints and reduce systematic uncertainties, and it makes the analysis software publicly available for reproducibility and further refinement by the community.
Abstract
We present measurements of the Hubble diagram for 103 Type Ia supernovae (SNe) with redshifts 0.04 < z < 0.42, discovered during the first season (Fall 2005) of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II (SDSS-II) Supernova Survey. These data fill in the redshift "desert" between low- and high-redshift SN Ia surveys. We combine the SDSS-II measurements with new distance estimates for published SN data from the ESSENCE survey, the Supernova Legacy Survey, the Hubble Space Telescope, and a compilation of nearby SN Ia measurements. Combining the SN Hubble diagram with measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the SDSS Luminous Red Galaxy sample and with CMB temperature anisotropy measurements from WMAP, we estimate the cosmological parameters w and Omega_M, assuming a spatially flat cosmological model (FwCDM) with constant dark energy equation of state parameter, w. For the FwCDM model and the combined sample of 288 SNe Ia, we find w = -0.76 +- 0.07(stat) +- 0.11(syst), Omega_M = 0.306 +- 0.019(stat) +- 0.023(syst) using MLCS2k2 and w = -0.96 +- 0.06(stat) +- 0.12(syst), Omega_M = 0.265 +- 0.016(stat) +- 0.025(syst) using the SALT-II fitter. We trace the discrepancy between these results to a difference in the rest-frame UV model combined with a different luminosity correction from color variations; these differences mostly affect the distance estimates for the SNLS and HST supernovae. We present detailed discussions of systematic errors for both light-curve methods and find that they both show data-model discrepancies in rest-frame $U$-band. For the SALT-II approach, we also see strong evidence for redshift-dependence of the color-luminosity parameter (beta). Restricting the analysis to the 136 SNe Ia in the Nearby+SDSS-II samples, we find much better agreement between the two analysis methods but with larger uncertainties.
