Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Search for a low-mass Higgs boson in Y(3S)-->gamma A^0, A^0-->tau^+tau^- at BABAR

The BABAR Collaboration, B. Aubert

TL;DR

No evidence for a narrow structure is found in the studied tau+tau- invariant mass region of 4.03<m(tau+ tau-)<10.10 GeV/c2.

Abstract

We search for a light Higgs boson, $A^0$, in the radiative decay $Υ(3S)\toγA^0$, $A^0\toτ^+τ^-$, $τ^+\to e^+ν_e \barν_τ$ or $τ^+\to μ^+ ν_μ \barν_τ$. The data sample contains 122 million $Υ(3S)$ events recorded with the \babar detector. We find no evidence for a narrow structure in the studied $τ^+τ^-$ invariant mass region of $4.03<m_{τ^+τ^-}<10.10$ \gevcc. We exclude at the 90% confidence level (C.L.) a low mass Higgs decaying to $τ^+τ^-$ with a product branching fraction ${\cal {B}}(Υ(3S)\toγA^0)\times {\cal {B}}(A^0\toτ^+τ^-)$ $>(1.5-16)\times 10^{-5}$ across the $m_{τ^+τ^-}$ range. We also set a 90% C.L. upper limit on the $τ^+τ^-$-decay of the $η_b$ at ${\mathcal{B}}(η_b\to τ^+τ^-)<8%$.

Search for a low-mass Higgs boson in Y(3S)-->gamma A^0, A^0-->tau^+tau^- at BABAR

TL;DR

No evidence for a narrow structure is found in the studied tau+tau- invariant mass region of 4.03<m(tau+ tau-)<10.10 GeV/c2.

Abstract

We search for a light Higgs boson, , in the radiative decay , , or . The data sample contains 122 million events recorded with the \babar detector. We find no evidence for a narrow structure in the studied invariant mass region of \gevcc. We exclude at the 90% confidence level (C.L.) a low mass Higgs decaying to with a product branching fraction across the range. We also set a 90% C.L. upper limit on the -decay of the at .

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 figures.

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: (a), (c), (e): $E_{\gamma}$ distributions for the different $\tau\tau$-decay modes. Filled circles show the data; dotted lines represent contributions from $焇(3S)\rightarrow\gamma\chi_{bJ}(2P)$, $\chi_{bJ}(2P)\rightarrow\gamma 焇(2S)$; dotted-dashed lines show contributions from $焇(3S)\rightarrow\gamma\chi_{bJ}(2P)$, $\chi_{bJ}(2P)\rightarrow\gamma 焇(1S)$; and solid lines show the total background function. For each $\tau\tau$-decay mode, the difference between the background function and the data divided by the uncertainty in the data is shown ((b), (d), (f)).
  • Figure 2: $N_{\mathrm{sig}}/\sigma (N_{\mathrm{sig}})$ as obtained from the scanning procedure. Only statistical uncertainties are included. The curve shows the standard normal distribution with a normalization factor of 307.
  • Figure 3: (a) Product branching fractions as a function of the Higgs mass. For each point, both the statistical uncertainty (from the central value to the horizontal bar) and the total uncertainty (statistical and systematic added in quadrature) are shown (from the central value to the end of the error bar). In (b), the corresponding 90$\%$ C.L. upper limits on the product of the branching fractions versus the Higgs mass values are shown, with total uncertainty (solid line) and statistical uncertainty only (dashed line). The shaded vertical region represents the excluded mass range corresponding to the $\chi_{bJ}(2P)\rightarrow\gamma 焇(1S)$ states.