Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers

Taylor Binnington, Eric Poisson

TL;DR

The paper presents a fully relativistic formulation of tidal Love numbers, defining electric-type $k_{ m el}$ and magnetic-type $k_{ m mag}$ for compact bodies and deriving their gauge-invariant meanings in a linear perturbation framework. By solving the external vacuum problem in Eddington–Finkelstein coordinates and the internal stellar problem for polytropes using a light-cone gauge, the authors obtain precise matching conditions at the stellar surface that yield the Love numbers. A key finding is that nonrotating black holes have vanishing tidal Love numbers, while neutron-star–like bodies exhibit strong, EOS-dependent tidal deformabilities that decrease with increasing compactness and stiffness. The numerical results provide comprehensive data for various multipoles ($l=2$–$5$) and polytropic indices, informing gravitational-wave modeling and EOS inference from tidal imprints in inspiral signals.

Abstract

In Newtonian gravitational theory, a tidal Love number relates the mass multipole moment created by tidal forces on a spherical body to the applied tidal field. The Love number is dimensionless, and it encodes information about the body's internal structure. We present a relativistic theory of Love numbers, which applies to compact bodies with strong internal gravities; the theory extends and completes a recent work by Flanagan and Hinderer, which revealed that the tidal Love number of a neutron star can be measured by Earth-based gravitational-wave detectors. We consider a spherical body deformed by an external tidal field, and provide precise and meaningful definitions for electric-type and magnetic-type Love numbers; and these are computed for polytropic equations of state. The theory applies to black holes as well, and we find that the relativistic Love numbers of a nonrotating black hole are all zero.

Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers

TL;DR

The paper presents a fully relativistic formulation of tidal Love numbers, defining electric-type and magnetic-type for compact bodies and deriving their gauge-invariant meanings in a linear perturbation framework. By solving the external vacuum problem in Eddington–Finkelstein coordinates and the internal stellar problem for polytropes using a light-cone gauge, the authors obtain precise matching conditions at the stellar surface that yield the Love numbers. A key finding is that nonrotating black holes have vanishing tidal Love numbers, while neutron-star–like bodies exhibit strong, EOS-dependent tidal deformabilities that decrease with increasing compactness and stiffness. The numerical results provide comprehensive data for various multipoles () and polytropic indices, informing gravitational-wave modeling and EOS inference from tidal imprints in inspiral signals.

Abstract

In Newtonian gravitational theory, a tidal Love number relates the mass multipole moment created by tidal forces on a spherical body to the applied tidal field. The Love number is dimensionless, and it encodes information about the body's internal structure. We present a relativistic theory of Love numbers, which applies to compact bodies with strong internal gravities; the theory extends and completes a recent work by Flanagan and Hinderer, which revealed that the tidal Love number of a neutron star can be measured by Earth-based gravitational-wave detectors. We consider a spherical body deformed by an external tidal field, and provide precise and meaningful definitions for electric-type and magnetic-type Love numbers; and these are computed for polytropic equations of state. The theory applies to black holes as well, and we find that the relativistic Love numbers of a nonrotating black hole are all zero.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 17 sections, 97 equations, 8 figures, 30 tables.

Figures (8)

  • Figure 1: Electric-type Love numbers for $l=2$, plotted as functions of the compactness parameter $2M/R$. The uppermost curve corresponds to $n=0.5$ and the stiffest equation of state. The lowermost curve corresponds to $n=2.0$ and the softest equation of state. The curves in between are ordered by the value of $n$. The arrangement is the same in all other figures.
  • Figure 2: Magnetic-type Love numbers for $l=2$, plotted as functions of the compactness parameter $2M/R$.
  • Figure 3: Electric-type Love numbers for $l=3$.
  • Figure 4: Magnetic-type Love numbers for $l=3$.
  • Figure 5: Electric-type Love numbers for $l=4$.
  • ...and 3 more figures