Table of Contents
Fetching ...

New Fixed-Target Experiments to Search for Dark Gauge Forces

James D. Bjorken, Rouven Essig, Philip Schuster, Natalia Toro

TL;DR

The paper analyzes light, kinetically mixed dark gauge bosons $A'$ with mass $m_{A'}$ in the MeV–GeV range and couplings set by $\epsilon$, motivated by anomalies suggesting new U(1)' dynamics. It formalizes the kinetic-mixing framework, derives production and decay properties in fixed-target collisions via bremsstrahlung, and provides simple rate estimates to map experimental sensitivity, including irreducible backgrounds. It then proposes five concrete fixed-target experimental scenarios (A–E) using current GeV-scale electron beams to cover complementary regions of parameter space, balancing beam-dump, thin-target, vertexing, and high-resolution spectrometry approaches. Together with existing constraints, these designs aim to exhaust the natural parameter space for $A'$ in the MeV–GeV range and to provide coverage relevant to dark matter phenomenology and terrestrial/astrophysical hints. The work emphasizes practical implementation at facilities like JLab and outlines extensions to broader dark-sector scenarios and muon-beam opportunities for further reach.

Abstract

Fixed-target experiments are ideally suited for discovering new MeV-GeV mass U(1) gauge bosons through their kinetic mixing with the photon. In this paper, we identify the production and decay properties of new light gauge bosons that dictate fixed-target search strategies. We summarize existing limits and suggest five new experimental approaches that we anticipate can cover most of the natural parameter space, using currently operating GeV-energy beams and well-established detection methods. Such experiments are particularly timely in light of recent terrestrial and astrophysical anomalies (PAMELA, FERMI, DAMA/LIBRA, etc.) consistent with dark matter charged under a new gauge force.

New Fixed-Target Experiments to Search for Dark Gauge Forces

TL;DR

The paper analyzes light, kinetically mixed dark gauge bosons with mass in the MeV–GeV range and couplings set by , motivated by anomalies suggesting new U(1)' dynamics. It formalizes the kinetic-mixing framework, derives production and decay properties in fixed-target collisions via bremsstrahlung, and provides simple rate estimates to map experimental sensitivity, including irreducible backgrounds. It then proposes five concrete fixed-target experimental scenarios (A–E) using current GeV-scale electron beams to cover complementary regions of parameter space, balancing beam-dump, thin-target, vertexing, and high-resolution spectrometry approaches. Together with existing constraints, these designs aim to exhaust the natural parameter space for in the MeV–GeV range and to provide coverage relevant to dark matter phenomenology and terrestrial/astrophysical hints. The work emphasizes practical implementation at facilities like JLab and outlines extensions to broader dark-sector scenarios and muon-beam opportunities for further reach.

Abstract

Fixed-target experiments are ideally suited for discovering new MeV-GeV mass U(1) gauge bosons through their kinetic mixing with the photon. In this paper, we identify the production and decay properties of new light gauge bosons that dictate fixed-target search strategies. We summarize existing limits and suggest five new experimental approaches that we anticipate can cover most of the natural parameter space, using currently operating GeV-energy beams and well-established detection methods. Such experiments are particularly timely in light of recent terrestrial and astrophysical anomalies (PAMELA, FERMI, DAMA/LIBRA, etc.) consistent with dark matter charged under a new gauge force.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 16 sections, 56 equations, 11 figures.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Left: Existing constraints on an $A'$. Shown are constraints from electron and muon anomalous magnetic moment measurements, $a_e$ and $a_{\mu}$, the BaBar search for $\Upsilon(3S)\to \gamma\mu^+\mu^-$, three beam dump experiments, E137, E141, and E774, and supernova cooling (SN). These constraints are discussed further in Section \ref{['sec:constraints']}. Right: Existing constraints are shown in gray, while the various lines --- light green (upper) solid, red short-dashed, purple dotted, blue long-dashed, and dark green (lower) solid --- show estimates of the regions that can be explored with the experimental scenarios discussed in Section \ref{['subsec:expA']}--\ref{['subsec:expE']}, respectively. The discussion in \ref{['sec:designs']} focuses on the five points labeled "A" through "E". The orange stripe denotes the "D-term" region introduced in section \ref{['sec:TheoryPrelim']}, in which simple models of dark matter interacting with the $A'$ can explain the annual modulation signal reported by DAMA/LIBRA. Along the thin black line, the $A'$ proper lifetime $c\tau=80 \mu$m, which is approximately the $\tau$ proper lifetime.
  • Figure 2: $A'$ production by bremsstrahlung off an incoming electron scattering off protons in a target with atomic number $Z$.
  • Figure 3: (a) $\gamma^*$ and (b) Bethe-Heitler trident reactions that comprise the primary QED background to $A'\rightarrow \ell^+\ell^-$ search channels.
  • Figure 4: Left: Experimental scenario for benchmark point A ($\epsilon\sim 10^{-5}$, $m_{A'}\sim 50$ MeV). An electron beam is incident on a 10 cm thick tungsten target. Behind the target is a 10 cm (or thicker) shield followed by an instrumented decay region consisting of a combination of tracking planes, electromagnetic calorimetry and scintillator triggers. Right: Reaches of the high- and low-energy dump configurations described in Section \ref{['subsec:expA']}, delineated by regions with 10 or more events and the following configurations --- Blue (inner) Solid Contour:$0.3$ C total charge dumped with a 200 MeV electron beam, a 20 cm shield, and a detector with 5 cm radius 50 cm behind the front of the target. The lepton pair must have total energy exceeding 100 MeV. Blue (inner) Dashed Contour: same configuration, but with no shield. Green (outer) Solid Contour:$0.1$ C (100 nA beam $\times$$10^6$ s) total charge dumped with a 6 GeV electron beam, a 3.9 m shield, and a detector with 10 cm radius 7 m downstream. The lepton pair must have total energy exceeding 3 GeV. Green (outer) Dashed Contour: same configuration, but with 0.9 m of shielding. Gray contours and Orange Stripe: exclusions from past experiments (E137 and E141) and the region that explains DAMA/LIBRA in a simple model --- see Figure \ref{['fig:bigSummary']} for more details.
  • Figure 5: Left: Experimental scenario for a small two-arm spectrometer for benchmark point B ($\epsilon\sim 3\times 10^{-5}$, $m_{A'}\sim 200$ MeV). An electron beam is incident upon a thin 0.1 radiation length tungsten target. A small two-arm spectrometer with silicon-strip trackers and a fast calorimeter or scintillator trigger is downstream from the target. Signal events are identified by requiring a displaced vertex $\sim$ 1 cm behind the target. More details are given in the text. Right: Regions corresponding to 10 or more events within acceptance in $10^6$ sec for three different geometries. From right to left: 6 GeV electron beam at 100 nA (0.1 C delivered), with angular acceptance from 20 to 55 mrad and a 1 m long detector (solid red line); 6 GeV beam at 5 nA ($5\times 10^{-3}$ C delivered), with angular acceptance from 10 to 27 mrad in a 2 m-long detector region (dashed darker red line); and 2 GeV beam at 0.5 nA ($5\times 10^{-4}$ C delivered) with the same geometry as the dashed red line (solid dark red line). In all cases, we require that the $A'$ carry at least 83% of the beam energy, the track impact parameters at the target exceed 50 $\mu$m, and the reconstructed vertex displacement exceed 1 cm. We assume 50% $\phi$ coverage. Gray contours and Orange Stripe: exclusions from past experiments (E137 and E141) and the region that explains DAMA/LIBRA in a simple model --- see Figure \ref{['fig:bigSummary']} for more details.
  • ...and 6 more figures