Table of Contents
Fetching ...

An improved analytical description of inspiralling and coalescing black-hole binaries

Thibault Damour, Alessandro Nagar

Abstract

We present an analytical formalism, within the Effective-One-Body framework, which predicts gravitational-wave signals from inspiralling and coalescing black-hole binaries that agree, within numerical errors, with the results of the currently most accurate numerical relativity simulations for several different mass ratios. In the equal-mass case, the gravitational wave energy flux predicted by our formalism agrees, within numerical errors, with the most accurate numerical-relativity energy flux. We think that our formalism opens a realistic possibility of constructing a sufficiently accurate, large bank of gravitational wave templates, as needed both for detection and data analysis of (non spinning) coalescing binary black holes.

An improved analytical description of inspiralling and coalescing black-hole binaries

Abstract

We present an analytical formalism, within the Effective-One-Body framework, which predicts gravitational-wave signals from inspiralling and coalescing black-hole binaries that agree, within numerical errors, with the results of the currently most accurate numerical relativity simulations for several different mass ratios. In the equal-mass case, the gravitational wave energy flux predicted by our formalism agrees, within numerical errors, with the most accurate numerical-relativity energy flux. We think that our formalism opens a realistic possibility of constructing a sufficiently accurate, large bank of gravitational wave templates, as needed both for detection and data analysis of (non spinning) coalescing binary black holes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 equations, 5 figures.

Figures (5)

  • Figure 1: Equal-mass case: agreement between NR (black online) and EOB-based (red online) $\ell=m=2$ metric waveforms.
  • Figure 2: Phase difference between the analytical and numerical (metric) waveforms of Fig. \ref{['fig:fig1']}.
  • Figure 3: Equal mass case: metric-amplitudes comparison. The maximum of the orbital frequency $\Omega$ defines the EOB merger.
  • Figure 4: Triple comparison between NR and EOB GW energy fluxes and the EOB mechanical energy loss.
  • Figure 5: Unequal mass case: Comparison between metric waveforms for the 2:1 mass ratio.