Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Semi-Flatland

David Vegh, John McGreevy

TL;DR

This work develops a semiflat framework to engineer non-geometric Type II vacua via $T^3$-fibered compactifications with duality monodromies, linking these to M-theory on $G_2$ manifolds and Joyce manifolds. By embedding the perturbative duality group into an auxiliary $T^4$ and using $SL(4,Z)$, the authors map T-duality actions to a geometric setting, enabling systematic construction and spectrum matching with M-theory in several cases. They build explicit backgrounds with ${D_4}$ and ${E_n}$-type singularities, including almost non-geometric asymmetric orbifolds, and analyze their massless spectra and dualities, illustrating how non-geometric data can correspond to geometric uplifts in M-theory. The study also investigates chiral Scherk-Schwarz reductions and outlines routes to lifting moduli via RR fluxes, aiming to broaden the landscape of ${ m obreak N=1}$ vacua with controlled duality properties and potential links to $G_2$ compactifications.

Abstract

We study perturbative compactifications of Type II string theory that rely on a fibration structure of the extra dimensions a la SYZ. Non-geometric spaces are obtained by using T-dualities as monodromies. These vacua generically preserve N=1 supersymmetry in four dimensions, and are U-dual to M-theory on G2 manifolds. Several examples are discussed, some of which admit an asymmetric orbifold description. The massless spectrum is matched to that of the dual M-theory compactification on a Joyce manifold when a comparison is possible. We explore the possibility of twisted reductions where left-moving spacetime fermion number Wilson lines are turned on in the fiber. We also give an explanation from this semiflat viewpoint for the Hanany-Witten brane-creation effect and for the equivalence of the Type IIA orientifold on T5/Z2 and Type IIB on S1 x K3.

Semi-Flatland

TL;DR

This work develops a semiflat framework to engineer non-geometric Type II vacua via -fibered compactifications with duality monodromies, linking these to M-theory on manifolds and Joyce manifolds. By embedding the perturbative duality group into an auxiliary and using , the authors map T-duality actions to a geometric setting, enabling systematic construction and spectrum matching with M-theory in several cases. They build explicit backgrounds with and -type singularities, including almost non-geometric asymmetric orbifolds, and analyze their massless spectra and dualities, illustrating how non-geometric data can correspond to geometric uplifts in M-theory. The study also investigates chiral Scherk-Schwarz reductions and outlines routes to lifting moduli via RR fluxes, aiming to broaden the landscape of vacua with controlled duality properties and potential links to compactifications.

Abstract

We study perturbative compactifications of Type II string theory that rely on a fibration structure of the extra dimensions a la SYZ. Non-geometric spaces are obtained by using T-dualities as monodromies. These vacua generically preserve N=1 supersymmetry in four dimensions, and are U-dual to M-theory on G2 manifolds. Several examples are discussed, some of which admit an asymmetric orbifold description. The massless spectrum is matched to that of the dual M-theory compactification on a Joyce manifold when a comparison is possible. We explore the possibility of twisted reductions where left-moving spacetime fermion number Wilson lines are turned on in the fiber. We also give an explanation from this semiflat viewpoint for the Hanany-Witten brane-creation effect and for the equivalence of the Type IIA orientifold on T5/Z2 and Type IIB on S1 x K3.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 38 sections, 149 equations, 35 figures, 10 tables.

Figures (35)

  • Figure 1: A possible fundamental domain (gray area) for the action of the $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ modular group on the upper half-plane. The upper-half plane parametrizes the possible values of $\tau$ (or $\rho$): the moduli of a two-torus. The gray domain can be folded into an $S^2$ with three special points (the two orbifold points: $\tau_{\mathbb{Z}_6} = e^{2\pi i /6}$ and $\tau_{\mathbb{Z}_4} = i$, and the decompactification point: $\tau\rightarrow i \infty$).
  • Figure 2: Base of the $T^4/\mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifold. The $\mathbb{Z}_2$ action inverts the base coordinates and has four fixed points denoted by red stars. They have $180^\circ$ deficit angle. As the arrows show, one has to fold the diagram and this gives an $S^2$.
  • Figure 3: Flat $S^2$ base constructed from four triangles: base of $K3$ in the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifold limit.
  • Figure 4: Singularities in the base of $T^6 / \mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$. The big dashed cube is the original $T^3$ base. The orbifold group generates the singular lines as depicted in the figure. The red dots show the intersection points of these edges.
  • Figure 5: (i) Rhombic dodecahedron: fundamental domain for the base of $T^6/\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2$. Six pyramids are glued on top of the faces of a cube. Neighboring pyramid triangles give rhombi since the vertices are coplanar ( e.g. $ABCD$). (ii) The $S^3$ base can be constructed by identifying triangles as shown by the arrows. After gluing, the deficit angle around cube edges is $180^\circ$ which is appropriate for a $D_4$ singularity. The dihedral angles of the dashed lines are $120^\circ$ and since three of them are glued together, there is no deficit angle. The tips of the pyramids get identified and the space finally becomes an $S^3$.
  • ...and 30 more figures