Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Varying the Universality of Supersymmetry-Breaking Contributions to MSSM Higgs Boson Masses

John Ellis, Keith A. Olive, Pearl Sandick

Abstract

We consider the minimal supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM) with varying amounts of non-universality in the soft supersymmetry-breaking contributions to the Higgs scalar masses. In addition to the constrained MSSM (CMSSM) in which these are universal with the soft supersymmetry-breaking contributions to the squark and slepton masses at the input GUT scale, we consider scenarios in which both the Higgs scalar masses are non-universal by the same amount (NUHM1), and scenarios in which they are independently non-universal (NUHM2). We show how the NUHM1 scenarios generalize the (m_{1/2}, m_0) planes of the CMSSM by allowing either mu or m_A to take different (fixed) values and we also show how the NUHM1 scenarios are embedded as special cases of the more general NUHM2 scenarios. Generalizing from the CMSSM, we find regions of the NUHM1 parameter space that are excluded because the LSP is a selectron. We also find new regions where the neutralino relic density falls within the range preferred by astrophysical and cosmological measurements, thanks to rapid annihilation through direct-channel Higgs poles, or coannihilation with selectrons, or because the LSP composition crosses over from being mainly bino to mainly Higgsino. Generalizing further to the NUHM2, we find regions of its parameter space where a sneutrino is the LSP, and others where neutralino coannihilation with sneutrinos is important for the relic density. In both the NUHM1 and the NUHM2, there are slivers of parameter space where the LHC has fewer prospects for discovering sparticles than in the CMSSM, because either m_{1/2} and/or m_0 may be considerably larger than in the CMSSM.

Varying the Universality of Supersymmetry-Breaking Contributions to MSSM Higgs Boson Masses

Abstract

We consider the minimal supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model (MSSM) with varying amounts of non-universality in the soft supersymmetry-breaking contributions to the Higgs scalar masses. In addition to the constrained MSSM (CMSSM) in which these are universal with the soft supersymmetry-breaking contributions to the squark and slepton masses at the input GUT scale, we consider scenarios in which both the Higgs scalar masses are non-universal by the same amount (NUHM1), and scenarios in which they are independently non-universal (NUHM2). We show how the NUHM1 scenarios generalize the (m_{1/2}, m_0) planes of the CMSSM by allowing either mu or m_A to take different (fixed) values and we also show how the NUHM1 scenarios are embedded as special cases of the more general NUHM2 scenarios. Generalizing from the CMSSM, we find regions of the NUHM1 parameter space that are excluded because the LSP is a selectron. We also find new regions where the neutralino relic density falls within the range preferred by astrophysical and cosmological measurements, thanks to rapid annihilation through direct-channel Higgs poles, or coannihilation with selectrons, or because the LSP composition crosses over from being mainly bino to mainly Higgsino. Generalizing further to the NUHM2, we find regions of its parameter space where a sneutrino is the LSP, and others where neutralino coannihilation with sneutrinos is important for the relic density. In both the NUHM1 and the NUHM2, there are slivers of parameter space where the LHC has fewer prospects for discovering sparticles than in the CMSSM, because either m_{1/2} and/or m_0 may be considerably larger than in the CMSSM.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 14 sections, 5 equations, 16 figures.

Figures (16)

  • Figure 1: Panel (a) shows the $(m_{1/2},m_0)$ plane for the CMSSM for $\tan \beta = 10$, with contours of $m_A$ and $\mu$ of 300, 500, 1000, and 1500 GeV as described in the text. Panels (b), (c), and (d) show the NUHM1 $(m_{1/2},m_0)$ planes for $\tan \beta = 10$ with $m_A = 500$, 1000, and 1500 GeV, respectively. Constraints and contours are as described in the text.
  • Figure 2: Examples of NUHM1 $(m_A,m_{1/2})$ planes with $\tan \beta = 10$, $A_0=0$, $\mu>0$, and $m_0=300$, 500, 1000, and 1500 GeV in Panels (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively. Constraints are displayed as in Figure \ref{['fig:m12m0fixmA']}.
  • Figure 3: Examples of NUHM1 $(m_A,m_0)$ planes with $\tan \beta = 10$, $A_0=0$, $\mu>0$, and $m_{1/2}=300$, 500, 1000, and 1500 GeV in Panels (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively. Constraints are displayed as in Figure \ref{['fig:m12m0fixmA']}.
  • Figure 4: Examples of NUHM1 $(m_A,m_{1/2})$ planes with $m_0 = 500$ GeV, $A_0=0$, $\mu>0$, and $\tan \beta=10$, 20, 35, and 50 in Panels (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively. Constraints are displayed as in Figure \ref{['fig:m12m0fixmA']}.
  • Figure 5: Examples of NUHM1 $(m_A,m_0)$ planes with $m_{1/2} = 500$ GeV, $A_0=0$, $\mu>0$, and $\tan \beta=10$, 20, 35, and 50 in Panels (a), (b), (c), and (d), respectively. Constraints are displayed as in Figure \ref{['fig:m12m0fixmA']}.
  • ...and 11 more figures