Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Light baryon masses with dynamical twisted mass fermions

C. Alexandrou, R. Baron, B. Blossier, M. Brinet, J. Carbonell, P. Dimopoulos, V. Drach, F. Farchioni, R. Frezzotti, P. Guichon, G. Herdoiza, K. Jansen, T. Korzec, G. Koutsou, Z. Liu, C. Michael, O. Pène, A. Shindler, C. Urbach, U. Wenger

TL;DR

The authors compute light baryon masses using two dynamical twisted mass quarks on three lattice spacings with pion masses down to ~$m_\pi\approx$300 MeV, performing continuum extrapolations via HB$\chi$PT. They demonstrate automatic $O(a)$ improvement and assess finite-volume and isospin-breaking effects, finding negligible lattice artifacts for the nucleon and vanishing ${O}(a^2)$ isospin breaking in the Δ system within errors. A combined HB$\chi$PT analysis yields $m_N^{phys}=0.963(12)(8)$ GeV and lattice spacings $a_{β=3.9}=0.0889(12)$ fm, $a_{β=4.05}=0.0691(10)$ fm, with $\sigma_N\approx66.7$ MeV; Δ masses are close to the experimental value and degenerate in the continuum. The work validates twisted mass fermions for reliable baryon spectroscopy and provides a cross-check of scale setting against the pion sector, with implications for future baryon-structure studies.

Abstract

We present results on the mass of the nucleon and the Delta using two dynamical degenerate twisted mass quarks and the tree-level Symanzik improved gauge action. The evaluation is performed at four quark masses corresponding to a pion mass in the range of about 300-600 MeV on lattices of 2.1-2.7 fm. We check for cut-off effects by evaluating these baryon masses on lattices of spatial size 2.1 fm at beta=3.9 and beta=4.05 and on a lattice of 2.4 fm at beta=3.8. The values we find are compatible within our statistical errors. Lattice results are extrapolated to the physical limit using continuum chiral perturbation theory. Performing a combined fit to our lattice data at beta=3.9 and beta=4.05 we find a nucleon mass of 964\pm 28 (stat.) \pm 8 (syst.) MeV. The nucleon mass at the physical point provides an independent determination of the lattice spacing. Using heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory at O(p^3) we find a_{β=3.9}=0.0890\pm 0.0039(stat.) \pm 0.0014(syst.) fm, and a_{β=4.05}= 0.0691\pm 0.0034(stat.) \pm 0.0010(syst.) fm, in good agreement with the values determined from the pion decay constant. Isospin violating lattice artifacts in the Delta-system are found to be compatible with zero for the values of the lattice spacings used in this work. Performing a combined fit to our lattice data at beta=3.9 and beta=4.05 we find for the masses of the Delta^{++,-} and Delta^{+,0} 1316 \pm 60 (stat.) MeV and 1330 \pm 74 (stat.) MeV respectively. We confirm that in the continuum limit they are also degenerate.

Light baryon masses with dynamical twisted mass fermions

TL;DR

The authors compute light baryon masses using two dynamical twisted mass quarks on three lattice spacings with pion masses down to ~300 MeV, performing continuum extrapolations via HBPT. They demonstrate automatic improvement and assess finite-volume and isospin-breaking effects, finding negligible lattice artifacts for the nucleon and vanishing isospin breaking in the Δ system within errors. A combined HBPT analysis yields GeV and lattice spacings fm, fm, with MeV; Δ masses are close to the experimental value and degenerate in the continuum. The work validates twisted mass fermions for reliable baryon spectroscopy and provides a cross-check of scale setting against the pion sector, with implications for future baryon-structure studies.

Abstract

We present results on the mass of the nucleon and the Delta using two dynamical degenerate twisted mass quarks and the tree-level Symanzik improved gauge action. The evaluation is performed at four quark masses corresponding to a pion mass in the range of about 300-600 MeV on lattices of 2.1-2.7 fm. We check for cut-off effects by evaluating these baryon masses on lattices of spatial size 2.1 fm at beta=3.9 and beta=4.05 and on a lattice of 2.4 fm at beta=3.8. The values we find are compatible within our statistical errors. Lattice results are extrapolated to the physical limit using continuum chiral perturbation theory. Performing a combined fit to our lattice data at beta=3.9 and beta=4.05 we find a nucleon mass of 964\pm 28 (stat.) \pm 8 (syst.) MeV. The nucleon mass at the physical point provides an independent determination of the lattice spacing. Using heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory at O(p^3) we find a_{β=3.9}=0.0890\pm 0.0039(stat.) \pm 0.0014(syst.) fm, and a_{β=4.05}= 0.0691\pm 0.0034(stat.) \pm 0.0010(syst.) fm, in good agreement with the values determined from the pion decay constant. Isospin violating lattice artifacts in the Delta-system are found to be compatible with zero for the values of the lattice spacings used in this work. Performing a combined fit to our lattice data at beta=3.9 and beta=4.05 we find for the masses of the Delta^{++,-} and Delta^{+,0} 1316 \pm 60 (stat.) MeV and 1330 \pm 74 (stat.) MeV respectively. We confirm that in the continuum limit they are also degenerate.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 28 equations, 18 figures, 8 tables.

Figures (18)

  • Figure 1: Lines of constant r.m.s radius as a function of the smearing parameters $\alpha$ and $n$. The asterisk shows the values $\alpha=2.9$, $n=30$ and the cross $\alpha=4.0$, $n=50$.
  • Figure 2: $m_{\rm eff}^N$ versus time separation both in lattice units. Crosses show results using local sink and source (LL), circles (asterisks) using Gaussian smearing at the sink (SL) with $\alpha=2.9$ and $n=30$ ( $\alpha=4$ and $n=50$), and filled triangles with $\alpha=4$ and $n=50$ and APE smearing. The dashed line is the plateau value extracted by fitting results when APE smearing is used.
  • Figure 3: Comparison of effective masses for $\Delta^{++,-}$ for $a\mu=0.0085$ at $\beta=3.9$ on the lattice volume $24^3 \times48$, obtained with (filled triangles) or without (open squares shifted to the left for clarity) spin projection, using a sample of 90 configurations. The mass difference with projection and without projection is much smaller than the statistical error.
  • Figure 4: Comparison of effective masses for $\Delta^{+}$ for $a\mu=0.011$ at $\beta=3.8$ on the lattice volume $24^3 \times48$, obtained with $3/2$-spin (filled triangles) or with $1/2$-spin projection, using a sample of 50 configurations.
  • Figure 5: Nucleon effective mass (LS: asterisks, SS: open triangles) for $\beta=3.9$ versus time separation in lattice units, for $a\mu=0.010$ (upper left), $0.0085$ (upper right), $0.0064$ (lower left) and $0.0040$ (lower right). The constant lines are the best fits to the data over the range spanned by the lines.
  • ...and 13 more figures