Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quivers with potentials associated to triangulated surfaces

Daniel Labardini-Fragoso

TL;DR

The paper links cluster algebras from triangulated bordered surfaces to DWZ quivers with potentials by associating to each ideal triangulation a QP (Q(τ), S(τ)) whose mutations mirror flips of the triangulation. It provides a detailed construction of S(τ) from interior triangles and puncture cycles, proves compatibility between triangulation flips and QP-mutations, and analyzes how reduction affects the mutation class. A main result shows that for surfaces with non-empty boundary, these QPs are rigid and thus non-degenerate, yielding finite-dimensional Jacobian algebras and a well-behaved mutation theory across triangulations. The work also clarifies the relationship to existing cluster-tilted and gentle algebras in special cases and outlines conjectures for empty-boundary surfaces. Together, these results deepen the representation-theoretic interpretation of cluster mutations in the geometric setting of surfaces.

Abstract

We attempt to relate two recent developments: cluster algebras associated to triangulations of surfaces by Fomin-Shapiro-Thurston, and quivers with potentials and their mutations introduced by Derksen-Weyman-Zelevinsky. To each ideal triangulation of a bordered surface with marked points we associate a quiver with potential, in such a way that whenever two ideal triangulations are related by a flip of an arc, the respective quivers with potentials are related by a mutation with respect to the flipped arc. We prove that if the surface has non-empty boundary, then the quivers with potentials associated to its triangulations are rigid and hence non-degenerate.

Quivers with potentials associated to triangulated surfaces

TL;DR

The paper links cluster algebras from triangulated bordered surfaces to DWZ quivers with potentials by associating to each ideal triangulation a QP (Q(τ), S(τ)) whose mutations mirror flips of the triangulation. It provides a detailed construction of S(τ) from interior triangles and puncture cycles, proves compatibility between triangulation flips and QP-mutations, and analyzes how reduction affects the mutation class. A main result shows that for surfaces with non-empty boundary, these QPs are rigid and thus non-degenerate, yielding finite-dimensional Jacobian algebras and a well-behaved mutation theory across triangulations. The work also clarifies the relationship to existing cluster-tilted and gentle algebras in special cases and outlines conjectures for empty-boundary surfaces. Together, these results deepen the representation-theoretic interpretation of cluster mutations in the geometric setting of surfaces.

Abstract

We attempt to relate two recent developments: cluster algebras associated to triangulations of surfaces by Fomin-Shapiro-Thurston, and quivers with potentials and their mutations introduced by Derksen-Weyman-Zelevinsky. To each ideal triangulation of a bordered surface with marked points we associate a quiver with potential, in such a way that whenever two ideal triangulations are related by a flip of an arc, the respective quivers with potentials are related by a mutation with respect to the flipped arc. We prove that if the surface has non-empty boundary, then the quivers with potentials associated to its triangulations are rigid and hence non-degenerate.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 17 theorems, 64 equations, 55 figures.

Key Result

Proposition 4

Given any collection of pairwise compatible arcs, it is always possible to find representatives in their isotopy classes whose relative interiors do not intersect each other.

Figures (55)

  • Figure 1: Paths are composed as functions
  • Figure 2: Self-folded triangle
  • Figure 3:
  • Figure 4: Some signed adjacency quivers
  • Figure 5: Some unreduced signed adjacency quivers
  • ...and 50 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (51)

  • Definition 1
  • Remark 1
  • Definition 2: FST, Definition 2.1
  • Remark 2
  • Definition 3: FST, Definition 2.2
  • Proposition 4
  • Definition 5
  • Proposition 6: FST, Propositions 3.8 and 7.10.
  • Theorem 7: FST, Proposition 4.8
  • Remark 3
  • ...and 41 more